Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20613634›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuropathology and experimental neurology2010

Early progenitor cell marker expression distinguishes type II from type I focal cortical dysplasias.

Ksenia A Orlova, Victoria Tsai, Marianna Baybis, Gregory G Heuer, Sanjay Sisodiya, Maria Thom, Kevin Strauss, Eleonora Aronica, Phillip B Storm, Peter B Crino

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Focal Cortical Dysplasia.Seminars in neurology · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Ksenia A OrlovaPENN Epilepsy Center and Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Victoria Tsai
Marianna Baybis
Gregory G Heuer
Sanjay Sisodiya
Maria Thom
Kevin Strauss
Eleonora Aronica
Phillip B Storm
Peter B Crino
Academic Medical Center · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Pennsylvania · USEpilepsy Research UK · GBStichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland · NLUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Structural consequences of TSC gene mutations in brainR01NS045021 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CRINO, PETER B · 2003 to 2012
$2.8M
NINDS NIH HHS NS045022NINDS NIH HHS NS045877NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS045021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type I and type II focal cortical dysplasias (FCDs) exhibit distinct histopathologic features that suggest different pathogenic mechanisms. Type I FCDs are characterized by mild laminar disorganization and hypertrophic neurons, whereas type II FCDs exhibit dramatic laminar disorganization and cytomegalic cells (balloon cells). Both FCD types are associated with intractable epilepsy; therefore, identifying cellular or molecular differences between these lesion types that explains the histologic differences could provide new diagnostic and therapeutic insights. Type II FCDs express nestin, a neuroglial progenitor protein that is modulated in vitro by the stem cell proteins c-Myc, sex-determining region Y-box 2 (SOX2), and Octamer-4 (Oct-4) after activation of mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1). Because mTORC1 activation has been demonstrated in type II FCDs, we hypothesized that c-Myc, SOX2, and Oct-4 expression would distinguish type II from type I FCDs. In addition, we assayed the expression of progenitor cell proteins forkhead box G1 (FOXG1), Kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4), Nanog, and SOX3. Differential expression of 7 stem cellproteins and aberrant phosphorylation of2mTORC1 substrates, S6 andS6 kinase 1 proteins, clearly distinguished type II from type I FCDs(n = 10 each). Our results demonstrate new potential pathogenic pathways in type II FCDs and suggest biomarkers for diagnostic pathology in resected epilepsy specimens.

Indexed as

AdolescentBrainCells, CulturedChildChild, PreschoolEpilepsyFemaleForkhead Transcription FactorsHumansInfantKruppel-Like Factor 4Kruppel-Like Transcription FactorsMaleMalformations of Cortical DevelopmentMechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1Multiprotein ComplexesForkhead Transcription FactorsFOXG1 protein, humanKLF4 protein, humanKruppel-Like Factor 4Kruppel-Like Transcription FactorsMechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1Multiprotein ComplexesMYC protein, humanNerve Tissue ProteinsOctamer Transcription Factor-3ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycSOX Transcription FactorsTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesTranscription FactorsTuberous Sclerosis Complex 1 ProteinTuberous Sclerosis Complex 2 ProteinTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20613634
PMCPMC3474261
OpenAlexW2130789019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.