Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20610811›Full record

ReviewBlood2010

The clinical application of monoclonal antibodies in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Samantha M Jaglowski, Lapo Alinari, Rosa Lapalombella, Natarajan Muthusamy, John C Byrd

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Do the Outcomes of Clinical Efficacy Trials Matter in Regulatory Decision-Making for Biosimilars?BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. NK Cells in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Their Therapeutic Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samantha M JaglowskiDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Lapo Alinari
Rosa Lapalombella
Natarajan Muthusamy
John C Byrd
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

Tissue CoreP01CA081534 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI KIPPS, THOMAS J · 2000 to 2016
$59.5M
TWO SIGNAL REQUIREMENT FOR NATURAL KILLER IMMUNITYP01CA095426 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CALIGIURI, MICHAEL A · 2002 to 2016
$29.6M
SPORE Leukemia Tissue BankP50CA140158 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BLOOMFIELD, CLARA D · 2009 to 2013
$11.2M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA081534NCI NIH HHS P01 CA095426NCI NIH HHS P01 CA81534NCI NIH HHS P01-CA95426NCI NIH HHS P50 CA140158NCI NIH HHS P50-CA140158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) represents the most prevalent adult leukemia. Treatment with chemotherapy over the past 3 decades has been palliative. The introduction of therapeutic antibodies has increased the number of treatment options for this disease. Despite this increase, our true understanding of the mechanism of action of antibody therapy in CLL remains limited. Rituximab, a CD20 antibody, is currently widely used in combination-based strategies for both previously untreated symptomatic CLL and as salvage therapy. Recent data suggest that the addition of rituximab to fludarabine with or without cyclophosphamide prolongs survival in younger patients with CLL. Other improved CD20 antibodies with promising clinical activity, including ofatumumab and GA-101, are coming forward. Alemtuzumab, a CD52 antibody, likewise has demonstrated benefit in both symptomatic, previously untreated CLL and in patients with relapsed disease but has less selectivity. Development of other therapeutic antibodies targeting alternative B-cell-specific antigens in CLL has been less successful, although many promising candidate antibodies and/or small modular immune pharmaceuticals (SMIPs) are coming forward. In addition, recent efforts to combine currently applied therapeutic antibodies with other biologic and targeted therapies with efficacy in CLL offers the potential to move toward alternative non-chemotherapy-based treatment approaches.

Indexed as

AdultAlemtuzumabAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntibodies, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsAutoimmune DiseasesClinical Trials as TopicCombined Modality TherapyHumansLeukemia, B-CellLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellModels, ImmunologicalRituximabAlemtuzumabAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntibodies, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsobinutuzumabofatumumabRituximab

Identifiers

PMID20610811
PMCPMC2981531
OpenAlexW2040935430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.