Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20610684›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2010

Clonal analysis of colonizing group B Streptococcus, serotype IV, an emerging pathogen in the United States.

Michelle J Diedrick, Aurea E Flores, Sharon L Hillier, Roberta Creti, Patricia Ferrieri

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Genomic Analysis of Group BOpen forum infectious diseases · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Evidence of Common Isolates ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michelle J DiedrickDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware St. SE, Mayo Mail Code 134, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Aurea E Flores
Sharon L Hillier
Roberta Creti
Patricia Ferrieri

Funding

PREVENTION OF GROUP B STREPTOCOCCAL /GBS/ DISEASE-266025495-266025495N01AI025495 · NIAID · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KASPER, DENNIS L. · 2002 to 2006
–
NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI025495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colonizing group B Streptococcus (GBS) capsular polysaccharide (CPS) type IV isolates were recovered from vaginal and rectal samples obtained from 97 (8.4%) nonpregnant women of 1,160 women enrolled in a U.S. multicenter GBS vaccine study from 2004 to 2008. Since this rate was much higher than the rate of prevalence of 0.4 to 0.6% that we found in previous studies, the isolates were analyzed by using surface protein profile identification, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) to characterize them and identify trends in DNA clonality and divergence. Of the 101 type IV isolates studied, 53 expressed alpha and group B protective surface (BPS) proteins, 27 expressed BPS only, 20 expressed alpha only, and 1 had no detectable surface proteins. The isolates spanned three PFGE macrorestriction profile groups, groups 37, 38, and 39, of which group 37 was predominant. The isolates in group 37 expressed the alpha and BPS proteins, while those in groups 38 and 39 expressed the alpha protein only, with two exceptions. MLST studies of selective isolates from the four protein profile groups showed that isolates expressing alpha,BPS or BPS only were of a new sequence type, sequence type 452, while those expressing alpha only or no proteins were mainly of a new sequence type, sequence type 459. Overall, our study revealed a limited diversity in surface proteins, MLST types, and DNA macrorestriction profiles for type IV GBS. There appeared to be an association between the MLST types and protein expression profiles. The increased prevalence of type IV GBS colonization suggested the possibility that this serotype may emerge as a GBS pathogen.

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesDNA FingerprintingBacterial ProteinsCluster AnalysisElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldFemaleHumansMolecular EpidemiologyRectumSequence Analysis, DNASerotypingStreptococcal InfectionsStreptococcus agalactiaeUnited StatesVaginaBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20610684
PMCPMC2937746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.