Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20609414›Full record

ReviewChemistry & biology2010

Illuminating insights into firefly luciferase and other bioluminescent reporters used in chemical biology.

Natasha Thorne, James Inglese, Douglas S Auld

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemistry & biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 142 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
142citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

142 citing papers in PubMed, 318 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Protein Engineering for Spatiotemporally Resolved Cellular Monitoring.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Imaging Approaches in Cancer Biology.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

82 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natasha ThorneNIH Chemical Genomics Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-3370, USA.
James Inglese
Douglas S Auld
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

NIH Chemical Genomics CenterZIBHG200319 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI AUSTIN, CHRISTOPHER P · 2010 to 2011
$55.9M
Intramural NIH HHS NIH0011934955PHS HHS NIH0011934955
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding luciferase enzymology and the structure of compounds that modulate luciferase activity can be used to improve the design of luminescence-based assays. This review provides an overview of these popular reporters with an emphasis on the commonly used firefly luciferase from Photinus pyralis (FLuc). Large-scale chemical profile studies have identified a variety of scaffolds that inhibit FLuc. In some cell-based assays, these inhibitors can act in a counterintuitive way, leading to a gain in luminescent signal. Although formerly attributed to transcriptional activation, intracellular stabilization of FLuc is the primary mechanism underlying this observation. FLuc inhibition and stabilization can be complex, as illustrated by the compound PTC124, which is converted by FLuc in the presence of ATP to a high affinity multisubstrate adduct inhibitor, PTC124-AMP. The potential influence these findings can have on drug discovery efforts is provided here.

Indexed as

AnimalsDarknessDrug DiscoveryEnzyme InhibitorsHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansLuciferases, FireflyLuminescent MeasurementsEnzyme InhibitorsLuciferases, Firefly

Identifiers

PMID20609414
PMCPMC2925662
OpenAlexW1998892616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.