Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20609235›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic pathology2010

Tissue microarrays: one size does not fit all.

Jeanette E Eckel-Passow, Christine M Lohse, Yuri Sheinin, Paul L Crispen, Christopher J Krco, Eugene D Kwon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic pathology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. SpOT the Correct Tissue Every Time in Multi-tissue Blocks.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jeanette E Eckel-PassowDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. eckelpassow.jeanette@mayo.edu
Christine M Lohse
Yuri Sheinin
Paul L Crispen
Christopher J Krco
Eugene D Kwon
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USUniversity of Kentucky · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

Clinical Impact of B7-H Immune Cell Coregulators in Renal Cell CarcinomaR01CA134345 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI DONG, HAIDONG, KWON, EUGENE D. · 2009 to 2014
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA134345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough tissue microarrays (TMAs) are commonly employed in clinical and basic-science research, there are no guidelines for evaluating the appropriateness of a TMA for a given biomarker and tumor type. Furthermore, TMA performance across multiple biomarkers has not been systematically explored.

methodsA simulated TMA with between 1 and 10 cores was designed to study tumor expression of 6 biomarkers with varied expression patterns (B7-H1, B7-H3, survivin, Ki-67, CAIX, and IMP3) using 100 patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We evaluated agreement between whole tissue section and TMA immunohistochemical biomarker quantification to assess how many TMA cores are necessary to adequately represent RCC whole tissue section expression. Additionally, we evaluated associations of whole tissue section and TMA expression with RCC-specific death.

resultsThe number of simulated TMA cores necessary to adequately represent whole tissue section quantification is biomarker specific. Although 2-3 cores appeared adequate for B7-H3, Ki-67, CAIX, and IMP3, even as many as 10 cores resulted in poor agreement for B7-H1 and survivin compared to RCC whole tissue sections. While whole tissue section B7-H1 was significantly associated with RCC-specific death, no significant associations were detected using as many as 10 TMA cores, suggesting that TMAs can result in false-negative findings if the TMA is not optimally designed.

conclusionsPrior to TMA analysis, the number of TMA cores necessary to accurately represent biomarker expression on whole tissue sections should be established as there is not a one-size-fits-all TMA. We illustrate the use of a simulated TMA as a cost-effective tool for this purpose.

Indexed as

ImmunohistochemistryTissue Array AnalysisBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyCarcinoma, Renal CellChi-Square DistributionFalse Negative ReactionsFemaleHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMinnesotaNeoplasm StagingNephrectomyObserver VariationPredictive Value of TestsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID20609235
PMCPMC2910003
OpenAlexW1985431936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.