Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20608874›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of infectious diseases2010

Magnitude and breadth of a nonprotective neutralizing antibody response in an efficacy trial of a candidate HIV-1 gp120 vaccine.

Peter Gilbert, Maggie Wang, Terri Wrin, Chris Petropoulos, Marc Gurwith, Faruk Sinangil, Patricia D'Souza, Isaac R Rodriguez-Chavez, Allan DeCamp, Mike Giganti and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Human Immunodeficiency Virus Vaccine: Promise and Challenges.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies for HIV prevention.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2021
    Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter GilbertVaccine Infectious Disease Institute, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Maggie Wang
Terri Wrin
Chris Petropoulos
Marc Gurwith
Faruk Sinangil
Patricia D'Souza
Isaac R Rodriguez-Chavez
Allan DeCamp
Mike Giganti
Phillip W Berman
Steve G Self
David C Montefiori
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USInfectious Disease Research Institute · USMonaghan Biosciences (Ireland) · IEDuke Medical Center · USGlobal Solutions for Infectious Diseases · USNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USNational Institutes of Health · USPAX Scientific (United States) · USUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · US

Funding

HIV Vaccine DevelopmentR13AI053895 · NIAID · KEYSTONE SYMPOSIA · PI MONTEFIORI, DAVID C · 2003 to 2003
$12k
NIAID NIH HHS AI46705NIAID NIH HHS R13 AI053895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA candidate vaccine consisting of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) subunit gp120 protein was found previously to be nonprotective in an efficacy trial (Vax004) despite strong antibody responses against the vaccine antigens. Here we assessed the magnitude and breadth of neutralizing antibody responses in Vax004.

methodsNeutralizing antibodies were measured against highly sensitive (tier 1) and moderately sensitive (tier 2) strains of HIV-1 subtype B in 2 independent assays. Vaccine recipients were stratified by sex, race, and high versus low behavioral risk of HIV-1 acquisition.

resultsMost vaccine recipients mounted potent neutralizing antibody responses against HIV-1(MN) and other tier 1 viruses. Occasional weak neutralizing activity was detected against tier 2 viruses. The response against tier 1 and tier 2 viruses was significantly stronger in women than in men. Race and behavioral risk of HIV-1 acquisition had no significant effect on the response. Prior vaccination had little effect on the neutralizing antibody response that arose after infection.

conclusionsWeak overall neutralizing antibody responses against tier 2 viruses is consistent with a lack of protection in this trial. The magnitude and breadth of neutralization reported here should be useful for identifying improved vaccines.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesAntibodies, NeutralizingFemaleHIV-1HIV AntibodiesHIV Envelope Protein gp120HumansMaleNeutralization TestsAIDS VaccinesAntibodies, Neutralizinggp120 protein, Human immunodeficiency virus 1HIV AntibodiesHIV Envelope Protein gp120

Identifiers

PMID20608874
PMCPMC2946208
OpenAlexW2157903295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.