Trial reportInvestigational new drugs2011
Feasibility study of gemcitabine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy for patients with refractory biliary tract cancer.
Trial report in Investigational new drugs, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of trametinib in Japanese patients with advanced biliary tract cancers refractory to gemcitabine.Cancer science · 2018Trial
- Treatment outcomes of chemotherapy between unresectable and recurrent biliary tract cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Trial
- Is there a role for second-line platinum re-challenge in advanced biliary tract cancers?Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2014Trial
- A multicenter phase II study of S-1 for gemcitabine-refractory biliary tract cancer.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2013Trial
- Multicenter phase II study of S-1 monotherapy as second-line chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer refractory to gemcitabine.Investigational new drugs · 2012Trial
- Apatinib for treating advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after failed chemotherapy: A case report and literature review.Medicine · 2018Review
- Signaling pathways as therapeutic targets in biliary tract cancer.Expert opinion on therapeutic targets · 2017Review
- Therapeutic options for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2017Review
- Second-Line Palliative Chemotherapy in Advanced Gall Bladder Cancer, CAP-IRI: Safe and Effective Option.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2016Article
- Nab-paclitaxel as alternative treatment regimen in advanced cholangiocellular carcinoma.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2016Article
- Second-line systemic treatment for advanced cholangiocarcinoma.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2014Article
- Curative resection of gallbladder cancer with liver invasion and hepatic metastasis after chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus S-1: report of a case.World journal of surgical oncology · 2014Article
- Current status of chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2013Review
- Improvement of prognosis for unresectable biliary tract cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2013Article
- Recent progress and limitations of chemotherapy for pancreatic and biliary tract cancers.World journal of clinical oncology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gemcitabine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy have been shown to have promising efficacy for the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) as a first-line chemotherapy. However, this treatment has not been approved for clinical practice in Japan. Oral fluoropyrimidines (e.g., S-1 and capecitabine) are also promising agents that are widely used with or without gemcitabine. Unfortunately, there is no standard chemotherapy for patients refractory to gemcitabine and oral fluoropyrimidine. We conducted a feasibility study of gemcitabine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy for patients with advanced BTC who are refractory to gemcitabine and S-1. Gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)) were administered intravenously on days 1 and 8, and this regimen was repeated every 3 weeks. Tumor response was assessed every two cycles using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0. Twenty patients with pathologically confirmed BTC were enrolled. Gemcitabine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy was administered as a second-line chemotherapy in thirteen patients and as a third-line chemotherapy in seven patients. Tumor response did not occur in any of the cases. Fourteen patients demonstrated stable diseases, and the disease control rate was 70%. Median overall survival and time-to-progression were 5.9 months (95% CI, 3.9-11.3 months) and 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.2-4.2 months), respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicities included leucopenia (35%), neutropenia (35%), anemia (20%), and thrombocytopenia (15%). Two patients treated for approximately 1 year developed cisplatin-related toxicities. In conclusion, gemcitabine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy produces a limited tumor response in BTC, but may prolong patient's survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.