Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20607585›Full record

Trial reportInvestigational new drugs2011

Feasibility study of gemcitabine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy for patients with refractory biliary tract cancer.

Takashi Sasaki, Hiroyuki Isayama, Yousuke Nakai, Suguru Mizuno, Keisuke Yamamoto, Hiroshi Yagioka, Yoko Yashima, Kazumichi Kawakubo, Hirofumi Kogure, Osamu Togawa and 7 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Investigational new drugs, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Signaling pathways as therapeutic targets in biliary tract cancer.Expert opinion on therapeutic targets · 2017
    Review
  8. Therapeutic options for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Second-line systemic treatment for advanced cholangiocarcinoma.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takashi SasakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Hiroyuki Isayama
Yousuke Nakai
Suguru Mizuno
Keisuke Yamamoto
Hiroshi Yagioka
Yoko Yashima
Kazumichi Kawakubo
Hirofumi Kogure
Osamu Togawa
Saburo Matsubara
Naoki Sasahira
Kenji Hirano
Takeshi Tsujino
Minoru Tada
Masao Omata
Kazuhiko Koike
The University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gemcitabine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy have been shown to have promising efficacy for the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) as a first-line chemotherapy. However, this treatment has not been approved for clinical practice in Japan. Oral fluoropyrimidines (e.g., S-1 and capecitabine) are also promising agents that are widely used with or without gemcitabine. Unfortunately, there is no standard chemotherapy for patients refractory to gemcitabine and oral fluoropyrimidine. We conducted a feasibility study of gemcitabine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy for patients with advanced BTC who are refractory to gemcitabine and S-1. Gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)) were administered intravenously on days 1 and 8, and this regimen was repeated every 3 weeks. Tumor response was assessed every two cycles using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0. Twenty patients with pathologically confirmed BTC were enrolled. Gemcitabine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy was administered as a second-line chemotherapy in thirteen patients and as a third-line chemotherapy in seven patients. Tumor response did not occur in any of the cases. Fourteen patients demonstrated stable diseases, and the disease control rate was 70%. Median overall survival and time-to-progression were 5.9 months (95% CI, 3.9-11.3 months) and 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.2-4.2 months), respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicities included leucopenia (35%), neutropenia (35%), anemia (20%), and thrombocytopenia (15%). Two patients treated for approximately 1 year developed cisplatin-related toxicities. In conclusion, gemcitabine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy produces a limited tumor response in BTC, but may prolong patient's survival.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiliary Tract NeoplasmsCisplatinDeoxycytidineDisease ProgressionFeasibility StudiesFemaleGemcitabineHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedSurvival RateCisplatinDeoxycytidineGemcitabine

Identifiers

PMID20607585
OpenAlexW1983753579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.