Trial reportHNO2010
[Xerostomia. Improved care using a spray with herbal polysaccharides].
Trial report in HNO, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn a prospective clinical study the topical use of a polysaccharide-containing spray for the treatment of xerostomia after radiotherapy in the head and neck area was tested. PATIENTS AND
methodsA total of 83 patients (evaluable return: n=55) with xerostomia after radiotherapy in the head and neck area received a pump spray with 50 ml Saliva natura (medac, Wedel, Germany) to test for 1 week. The patients were asked to fill in a questionnaire about their xerostomia with and without use of the spray. Individual items included: xerostomia in the state of rest, difficulties speaking, eating and sleeping, frequency of the use of treatment against xerostomia, changes in taste, and saliva viscosity. Additionally, they assessed the spray in general and for taste.
resultsPatients reported an improvement in all areas included in the questionnaire. The greatest effect of the spray was seen in sleeping difficulties, which improved by almost a whole point from 3.65 to 2.67, as well as in the frequency of use of xerostomia treatment (averagely 15x/day without and 10x/day with the spray). On average the spray was graded as "satisfactory" (3.09), while its taste was graded as "good" (2.17).
conclusionThe tested spray may help improve the situation of patients with xerostomia following radiotherapy in the head and neck area. These patients should be given the opportunity to test a spray of this kind.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.