Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20607507›Full record

ReviewHNO2010

[Tumors and tumor-like lesions of the orbit].

W E Lieb

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in HNO, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Orbital tumors].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. [Clinical and neuroradiological diagnostics of orbital tumors].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

W E LiebAugenklinik der St.-Vincentius-Kliniken gAG, Steinhäuserstrasse 18, 76135 Karlsruhe. Prof.Lieb@vincentius-ka.de
St. Vincentius-Kliniken · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article gives an overview of the most common and clinically relevant tumors of the orbit and their treatment. The most common orbital tumors in childhood are cystic tumors, such as dermoid and epidermoid cysts. Capillary hemangiomas are the most common primary benign tumors of the orbit and appear mostly in the first year of life. In contrast teratomas are rare and histologically mostly benign. Neural tumors are, for example, gliomas of the optic nerve and in 25-50% of cases are associated with neurofibromatosis. Rhabdomyosarcoma is a rapidly growing malignant orbital tumor whereby the stage and localization are the most important prognostic factors for survival chance in children. Leukemia can be associated with a chloroma especially in the first decade of life. Lymphoproliferative diseases, vascular and cystic tumors in particular are known as tumors of adulthood. In addition to fibroosseous and mesenchymal tumors, neural forms, such as schwannomas are also important. Secondary tumors of the orbit are often manifested in the nose and paranasal sinuses.

Indexed as

HumansOrbital Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID20607507
OpenAlexW2171829255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.