Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20607432›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2011

Patient perspectives of clinical care and patient navigation in follow-up of abnormal mammography.

Karen Donelan, Johanna R Mailhot, David Dutwin, Kristen Barnicle, Sarah Abernethy Oo, Karin Hobrecker, Sanja Percac-Lima, Bruce A Chabner

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05527392 (Assessing the Effect of Virtual Navigation Interventions to Improve Health Insurance Literacy and Decrease Financial Burden), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05527392 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Assessing the Effect of Virtual Navigation Interventions to Improve Health Insurance Literacy and Decrease Financial Burden: A Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Randomized Trial (HINTII)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassachusetts General HospitalRan2023 to 2027Enrolled529ConditionsChildhood Cancer SurvivorsArmsHealth Insurance Navigation Tools Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of patient navigation on satisfaction with cancer care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Group Versus Individual Educational Sessions With aAJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2019
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. A cluster randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of patient navigation in improving quality of diagnostic care for patients with breast or colorectal cancer abnormalities.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2012
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A mixed-methods process evaluation of Family Navigation implementation for autism spectrum disorder.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Effect of patient navigation on satisfaction with cancer-related care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Effects of Patient Navigation on Patient Satisfaction Outcomes.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Karen DonelanMongan Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford St, 9th Floor, Boston, MA 02114, USA. kdonelan@partners.org
Johanna R Mailhot
David Dutwin
Kristen Barnicle
Sarah Abernethy Oo
Karin Hobrecker
Sanja Percac-Lima
Bruce A Chabner
Chelsea Hospital · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USGlobal Cancer Institute · USMass General Brigham · USOffice of Patient Care Services · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRacial and ethnic disparities in cancer care and survival are well documented. Patient navigation has been shown to improve timely follow-up of abnormal breast screenings for underserved patients. Few studies showed the impact of navigation on patient experiences of care.

objectiveWe compared the experiences of patients enrolled in a patient navigator program and non-navigated patients referred to a hospital breast center for follow-up of abnormal mammogram in an underserved community health center population.

designGroup comparison study using data from a mail and telephone survey to measure the experience of navigated and non-navigated patients.

participantsEnglish- and Spanish-speaking patients with abnormal mammography attending the Avon Breast Center between April 1, 2005 and April 30, 2007. Seventy-two navigated patients and 181 non-navigated patients completed surveys; the survey response rate was 53.6%. MAIN MEASURES: Timeliness of care, preparation for the visit to the breast center, ease of access, quality of care, provider communication, unmet need and patient satisfaction. KEY

resultsMost measures of the patient experience did not differ between navigated and non-navigated patients. Overall quality of care was rated as excellent (55% vs 62%, p = 0.294). Navigated patients were significantly more likely than non-navigated to 'definitely' understand what to expect at their visit (79% vs 60%, p = 0.003), to receive a reminder letter or telephone call (89% vs 77%, p = 0.029), and to feel welcome (89% vs 75%, p = 0.012). Navigated patients were less likely than non-navigated to rate the concern shown for their cultural/religious beliefs as excellent (45% vs 54%, p = 0.014).

conclusionsAssessing patient perspectives is essential to evaluate the success of quality improvement interventions. In our center, we measured few significant disparities in the perceptions of care of these two very different populations of patients, although, there are still areas in which our program needs improvement. Further research is needed to understand the effectiveness of patient navigation programs in reducing racial and ethnic disparities.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareAdolescentAdultBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMammographyMiddle AgedOutpatient Clinics, HospitalPatient CarePatient SatisfactionPilot ProjectsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID20607432
PMCPMC3019311
OpenAlexW2079246921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.