Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20607365›Full record

ReviewClinical & experimental metastasis2010

Proteomic strategies and challenges in tumor metastasis research.

Petra Hudler, Masa Gorsic, Radovan Komel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Challenges of deciphering gastric cancer heterogeneity.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Petra HudlerMedical Centre for Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Masa Gorsic
Radovan Komel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapidly evolving field of proteomics offers new approaches to understanding the pathogenesis of cancer and metastatic disease. Although numerous tumor markers have been identified with different genomic methods in the past, most are either not specific or sensitive enough to be used in routine clinical setting. The rationale for proteomic profiling is based on the fact that proteins represent the dynamic state of the cells, reflecting pathophysiological changes in the disease more accurately than genomic and epigenetic alterations. Emerging proteomic techniques allow simultaneous assessment of a large number of proteins at one time. The study of protein profiles in complex systems, such as plasma, serum or tissues of cancer patients is likely to become valuable for monitoring the response of patients during treatment or for detecting recurrence of the disease.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorComputational BiologyElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelHumansMass SpectrometryNeoplasm MetastasisProtein Array AnalysisProteomicsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.