ArticleStatistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics2009
Methodological Issues in Multistage Genome-wide Association Studies.
Article in Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Large-scale pharmacogenomic study of sulfonylureas and the QT, JT and QRS intervals: CHARGE Pharmacogenomics Working Group.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2018Pooled it
- Verification of the Chromosome Region 9q21 Association with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Using RegulomeDB Annotations.BioMed research international · 2015Trial
- DNAJC13 influences responses of the extended reward system to conditioned stimuli: a genome-wide association study.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025Article
- Mitochondrial-derived microproteins: from discovery to function.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2025Review
- Find the Needle in the Haystack, Then Find It Again: Replication and Validation in the 'Omics Era.Metabolites · 2020Review
- Genome-wide association studies of albuminuria: towards genetic stratification in diabetes?Journal of nephrology · 2018Review
- Two-phase designs for joint quantitative-trait-dependent and genotype-dependent sampling in post-GWAS regional sequencing.Genetic epidemiology · 2018Article
- Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies a novel susceptibility signal at CACNA2D3 for nicotine dependence.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2017Article
- A Neighborhood-Wide Association Study (NWAS): Example of prostate cancer aggressiveness.PloS one · 2017Article
- Accounting for selection and correlation in the analysis of two-stage genome-wide association studies.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2016Article
- Estimating Effect Sizes and Expected Replication Probabilities from GWAS Summary Statistics.Frontiers in genetics · 2016Article
- Article
- Robust Association Tests for the Replication of Genome-Wide Association Studies.BioMed research international · 2015Article
- Two-stage family-based designs for sequencing studies.BMC proceedings · 2014Article
- Two-phase and family-based designs for next-generation sequencing studies.Frontiers in genetics · 2013Review
- Empirical hierarchical bayes approach to gene-environment interactions: development and application to genome-wide association studies of lung cancer in TRICL.Genetic epidemiology · 2013Article
- GIGI: an approach to effective imputation of dense genotypes on large pedigrees.American journal of human genetics · 2013Article
- Some surprising twists on the road to discovering the contribution of rare variants to complex diseases.Human heredity · 2012Article
- Improved minimum cost and maximum power two stage genome-wide association study designs.PloS one · 2012Article
- Enriching targeted sequencing experiments for rare disease alleles.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Because of the high cost of commercial genotyping chip technologies, many investigations have used a two-stage design for genome-wide association studies, using part of the sample for an initial discovery of "promising" SNPs at a less stringent significance level and the remainder in a joint analysis of just these SNPs using custom genotyping. Typical cost savings of about 50% are possible with this design to obtain comparable levels of overall type I error and power by using about half the sample for stage I and carrying about 0.1% of SNPs forward to the second stage, the optimal design depending primarily upon the ratio of costs per genotype for stages I and II. However, with the rapidly declining costs of the commercial panels, the generally low observed ORs of current studies, and many studies aiming to test multiple hypotheses and multiple endpoints, many investigators are abandoning the two-stage design in favor of simply genotyping all available subjects using a standard high-density panel. Concern is sometimes raised about the absence of a "replication" panel in this approach, as required by some high-profile journals, but it must be appreciated that the two-stage design is not a discovery/replication design but simply a more efficient design for discovery using a joint analysis of the data from both stages. Once a subset of highly-significant associations has been discovered, a truly independent "exact replication" study is needed in a similar population of the same promising SNPs using similar methods. This can then be followed by (1) "generalizability" studies to assess the full scope of replicated associations across different races, different endpoints, different interactions, etc.; (2) fine-mapping or re-sequencing to try to identify the causal variant; and (3) experimental studies of the biological function of these genes. Multistage sampling designs may be more useful at this stage, say for selecting subsets of subjects for deep re-sequencing of regions identified in the GWAS.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.