Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20606646›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy2010

Gene transfer efficiency and genome-wide integration profiling of Sleeping Beauty, Tol2, and piggyBac transposons in human primary T cells.

Xin Huang, Hongfeng Guo, Syam Tammana, Yong-Chul Jung, Emil Mellgren, Preetinder Bassi, Qing Cao, Zheng Jin Tu, Yeong C Kim, Stephen C Ekker and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 106 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 179 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Strategies for Altering Delivery Technologies to Optimize CAR Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Current Non-Viral-Based Strategies to Manufacture CAR-T Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Recombinant CHO Cell Pool Generation Using PiggyBac Transposon System.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Xin HuangDivision of Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplantation, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Hongfeng Guo
Syam Tammana
Yong-Chul Jung
Emil Mellgren
Preetinder Bassi
Qing Cao
Zheng Jin Tu
Yeong C Kim
Stephen C Ekker
Xiaolin Wu
San Ming Wang
Xianzheng Zhou
University of Minnesota Medical Center · USNorthwestern University · USUniversity of Minnesota · USMacalester College · USMayo Clinic · USScience Applications International Corporation (United States) · US

Funding

Intron-based Mutagenic Transposons for ZebrafishR01DA014546 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI EKKER, STEPHEN CARL · 2001 to 2011
$3.5M
CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001ENIDA NIH HHS R01 DA014546PHS HHS 261200800001E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we compared the genomic integration efficiencies and transposition site preferences of Sleeping Beauty (SB or SB11), Tol2, and piggyBac (PB) transposon systems in primary T cells derived from peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) and umbilical cord blood (UCB). We found that PB demonstrated the highest efficiency of stable gene transfer in PBL-derived T cells, whereas SB11 and Tol2 mediated intermediate and lowest efficiencies, respectively. Southern hybridization analysis demonstrated that PB generated the highest number of integrants when compared to SB and Tol2 in both PBL and UCB T cells. Tol2 and PB appeared more likely to promote clonal expansion than SB, which may be in part due to the dysregulated expression of cancer-related genes near the insertion sites. Genome-wide integration analysis demonstrated that SB, Tol2, and PB integrations occurred in all the chromosomes without preference. Additionally, Tol2 and PB integration sites were mainly localized near transcriptional start sites (TSSs), CpG islands and DNaseI hypersensitive sites, whereas SB integrations were randomly distributed. These results suggest that SB may be a preferential choice of the delivery vector in T cells due to its random integration site preference and relatively high efficiency, and support continuing development of SB-mediated T-cell phase I trials.

Indexed as

Gene Transfer TechniquesCells, CulturedComputational BiologyDNA Transposable ElementsHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionT-LymphocytesTransposasesDNA Transposable ElementsTransposases

Identifiers

PMID20606646
PMCPMC2951558
OpenAlexW2088147518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.