Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20604971›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2010

The combined effect of erythropoietin and granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor on liver regeneration after major hepatectomy in rats.

Ioannis Vassiliou, Evangelos Lolis, Constantinos Nastos, Aliki Tympa, Theodosios Theodosopoulos, Nikolaos Dafnios, George Fragulidis, Matrona Frangou, Agathi Kondi-Pafiti, Vassilios Smyrniotis

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ioannis VassiliouExperimental Surgical Unit, 2nd Department of Surgery, Medical School, University of Athens, Aretaieion Hospital, Athens 11528, Greece. ianvass@otenet.gr
Evangelos Lolis
Constantinos Nastos
Aliki Tympa
Theodosios Theodosopoulos
Nikolaos Dafnios
George Fragulidis
Matrona Frangou
Agathi Kondi-Pafiti
Vassilios Smyrniotis
Aretaeio Hospital · GRNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe liver presents a remarkable capacity for regeneration after hepatectomy but the exact mechanisms and mediators involved are not yet fully clarified. Erythropoietin (EPO) and Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) have been shown to promote liver regeneration after major hepatectomy.Aim of this experimental study is to compare the impact of exogenous administration of EPO, GM-CSF, as well as their combination on the promotion of liver regeneration after major hepatectomy.

methodsWistar rats were submitted to 70% major hepatectomy. The animals were assigned to 4 experimental groups: a control group (n = 21) that received normal saline, an EPO group (n = 21), that received EPO 500 IU/kg, a GM-CSF group (n = 21) that received 20 mcg/kg of GM-CSF and a EPO+GMCSF group (n = 21) which received a combination of the above. Seven animals of each group were killed on the 1st, 3rd and 7th postoperative day and their remnant liver was removed to evaluate liver regeneration by immunochemistry for PCNA and Ki 67.

resultsOur data suggest that EPO and GM-CSF increases liver regeneration following major hepatectomy when administered perioperatively. EPO has a more significant effect than GM-CSF (p < 0.01). When administering both, the effect of EPO seems to fade as EPO and GM-CSF treated rats have decreased regeneration compared to EPO administration alone (p < 0.01).

conclusionEPO, GM-CSF and their combination enhance liver regeneration after hepatectomy in rats when administered perioperatively. However their combination has a weaker effect on liver regeneration compared to EPO alone. Further investigation is needed to assess the exact mechanisms that mediate this finding.

Indexed as

HepatectomyAnimalsBody WeightDrug CombinationsErythropoietinGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorKi-67 AntigenLiverLiver RegenerationMalePostoperative PeriodPreoperative PeriodProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenRatsRats, WistarDrug CombinationsErythropoietinGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorKi-67 AntigenProliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen

Identifiers

PMID20604971
PMCPMC2917416
OpenAlexW2132694976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.