Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20604817›Full record

ReviewJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2010

Myocardial telocytes: a specific new cellular entity.

Sawa Kostin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Young cardiac telocyte-derived exosomes rejuvenate aging hearts in rats.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cardiac telocytes exist in the adult Xenopus tropicalis heart.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2020
    Article
  14. Emerging diverse roles of telocytes.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Telocytes in the human sinoatrial node.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sawa KostinMax-Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research (W.C. Kerckhoff Institute), Bad Nauheim, Germany. sawa.kostin@mpi-bn.mpg.de

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The existence of a new type of interstitial cells in the heart namely, interstitial Cajal-like cells (ICLC), has been described for the first time by Hinescu and Popescu in 2005. This study was then followed by an ascending trend of publications regarding the morphology, phenotype and distribution of myocardial ICLC in diverse species including human patients. Recently the new term 'telocytes' has been proposed for cells formerly known as ICLC, and the term 'telopodes' has been proposed for the prolongations of these cells. The identification of these cells is based on ultrastructural criteria. In addition, telocyters/telyopodes can be identified by several complementary approaches including methylene blue vital staining, silver impregnation and immunoreactivity against CD117/c-kit, vimentin, etc. This point of view presents critical data existing in literature, as well as own results, which unequivocally provide compelling evidence that telocytes are a new distinct cellular entity of myocardial interstitium. Several presumable functions of the myocardial telocytes are discussed: (i) intercellular signalling, (ii) cardiac repair/remodelling and (iii) stem cell nursing in cardiac renewal.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansMicroscopy, ElectronMyocardiumRats

Identifiers

PMID20604817
PMCPMC3823273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.