Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20604696›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of health behavior

Long-term fruit and vegetable change in worksites: Seattle 5 a Day follow-up.

Shirley A A Beresford, Beti Thompson, Sonia Bishop, Jessica Macintyre, Dale McLerran, Yutaka Yasui

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of health behavior. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shirley A A BeresfordDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7236, USA. beresfrd@u.washington.edu
Beti Thompson
Sonia Bishop
Jessica Macintyre
Dale McLerran
Yutaka Yasui

Funding

Enhancing Long-Term 5-a-Day Behavior Change in WorksitesR01CA105835 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BERESFORD, SHIRLEY AA · 2004 to 2008
$3.0M
WORKSITE PROGRAM TO INCREASE FRUIT AND VEGETABLE INTAKER01CA059731 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BERESFORD, SHIRLEY AA · 1993 to 2002
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA059731NCI NIH HHS R01 CA105835NCI NIH HHS R01 CA59731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate long-term change in fruit and vegetable intake following a group randomized trial of worksites.

methodsMedium-sized blue-collar businesses in the Seattle metropolitan area were recruited. Intake was assessed using serial cross-sectional samples of current workforce at 3 time points. The multilevel 18-month intervention involved partnership with the companies. Long-term follow-up was at 4.4 years postbaseline. Statistical analysis used general linear models, adjusting for worksite random effects.

resultsInitially, 45 worksites were randomized, with 29 agreeing to participate in a new study. Fruits and vegetable intake increased, with larger sustained changes in the intervention worksites, resulting in a long-term differential change of 0.25 servings per day, 95% confidence interval (0.09 to 0.40).

conclusionsIntervention sustained small effects at 4 years, including 2 years with no contact. Although effects were not large, this low-intensity intervention approach could provide an important public health model.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorHealth BehaviorAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFruitHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational Health ServicesOutcome Assessment, Health CareVegetablesWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID20604696
PMCPMC3658284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.