Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20603021›Full record

ArticleCell2010

A comprehensive comparison of transmembrane domains reveals organelle-specific properties.

Hayley J Sharpe, Tim J Stevens, Sean Munro

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cell, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 285 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
285citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

285 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Predicting membrane protein localization by deep learning on structure and chemistry.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Hydrophobic mismatch induces lipid sorting based on tail unsaturation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Trafficking of the human NaProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Genome-Wide Identification of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

225 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hayley J SharpeMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK.
Tim J Stevens
Sean Munro

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105178783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The various membranes of eukaryotic cells differ in composition, but it is at present unclear if this results in differences in physical properties. The sequences of transmembrane domains (TMDs) of integral membrane proteins should reflect the physical properties of the bilayers in which they reside. We used large datasets from both fungi and vertebrates to perform a comprehensive comparison of the TMDs of proteins from different organelles. We find that TMDs are not generic but have organelle-specific properties with a dichotomy in TMD length between the early and late parts of the secretory pathway. In addition, TMDs from post-ER organelles show striking asymmetries in amino acid compositions across the bilayer that is linked to residue size and varies between organelles. The pervasive presence of organelle-specific features among the TMDs of a particular organelle has implications for TMD prediction, regulation of protein activity by location, and sorting of proteins and lipids in the secretory pathway.

Indexed as

Protein Structure, TertiaryStructural Homology, ProteinAnimalsCell MembraneGolgi ApparatusHumansHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsMembrane ProteinsOrganellesMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20603021
PMCPMC2928124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.