ArticleBMC genomics2010
Development of admixture mapping panels for African Americans from commercial high-density SNP arrays.
Article in BMC genomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Insights from the Biorepository and Integrative Genomics pediatric resource.Nature communications · 2025Article
- The Biorepository and Integrative Genomics resource for inclusive genomics: insights from a diverse pediatric and admixed cohort.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Joint genotype and ancestry analysis identify novel loci associated with atopic dermatitis in African American population.HGG advances · 2024Article
- Genome-wide admixture and association analysis identifies African ancestry-specific risk loci of eosinophilic esophagitis in African Americans.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2023Article
- Extensive set of African ancestry-informative markers (AIMs) to study ancestry and population health.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- GWAS in Africans identifies novel lipids loci and demonstrates heterogenous association within Africa.Human molecular genetics · 2021Article
- Genetic Ancestry Inference and Its Application for the Genetic Mapping of Human Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Genetic ancestry is associated with measures of subclinical atherosclerosis in African Americans: the Jackson Heart Study.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2015Article
- Ancestry-informative markers for African Americans based on the Affymetrix Pan-African genotyping array.PeerJ · 2014Article
- Genetic admixture and obesity: recent perspectives and future applications.Human heredity · 2013Review
- Article
- Development of a panel of genome-wide ancestry informative markers to study admixture throughout the Americas.PLoS genetics · 2012Article
- Article
- Improved eigenanalysis of discrete subpopulations and admixture using the minimum average partial test.Human heredity · 2012Article
- Investigating population stratification and admixture using eigenanalysis of dense genotypes.Heredity · 2011Article
- Mapping of disease-associated variants in admixed populations.Genome biology · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdmixture mapping is a powerful approach for identifying genetic variants involved in human disease that exploits the unique genomic structure in recently admixed populations. To use existing published panels of ancestry-informative markers (AIMs) for admixture mapping, markers have to be genotyped de novo for each admixed study sample and samples representing the ancestral parental populations. The increased availability of dense marker data on commercial chips has made it feasible to develop panels wherein the markers need not be predetermined.
resultsWe developed two panels of AIMs (approximately 2,000 markers each) based on the Affymetrix Genome-Wide Human SNP Array 6.0 for admixture mapping with African American samples. These two AIM panels had good map power that was higher than that of a denser panel of approximately 20,000 random markers as well as other published panels of AIMs. As a test case, we applied the panels in an admixture mapping study of hypertension in African Americans in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area.
conclusionsDeveloping marker panels for admixture mapping from existing genome-wide genotype data offers two major advantages: (1) no de novo genotyping needs to be done, thereby saving costs, and (2) markers can be filtered for various quality measures and replacement markers (to minimize gaps) can be selected at no additional cost. Panels of carefully selected AIMs have two major advantages over panels of random markers: (1) the map power from sparser panels of AIMs is higher than that of approximately 10-fold denser panels of random markers, and (2) clusters can be labeled based on information from the parental populations. With current technology, chip-based genome-wide genotyping is less expensive than genotyping approximately 20,000 random markers. The major advantage of using random markers is the absence of ascertainment effects resulting from the process of selecting markers. The ability to develop marker panels informative for ancestry from SNP chip genotype data provides a fresh opportunity to conduct admixture mapping for disease genes in admixed populations when genome-wide association data exist or are planned.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.