Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20602618›Full record

ReviewPharmacogenomics2010

Irinotecan pharmacogenomics.

Sharon Marsh, Janelle M Hoskins

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacogenomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Pharmacogenomics in Cytotoxic Chemotherapy of Cancer.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The pharmacokinetic interaction between irinotecan and sunitinib.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sharon MarshUNC Institute for Pharmacogenomics & Individualized Therapy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. smarsh@pharmacy.ualberta.ca
Janelle M Hoskins
University of Alberta · CAUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

POPULATION GENETICS AND DRUG METABOLISMU01GM063340 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MCLEOD, HOWARD L · 2001 to 2009
$17.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM063340NIGMS NIH HHS U01GM63340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Irinotecan is a camptothecin analog used as an anticancer drug. Severe, potentially life-threatening toxicities can occur from irinotecan treatment. Although multiple genes may play a role in irinotecan activity, the majority of evidence to date suggests that variation in expression of UGT1A1 caused by a common promoter polymorphism (UGT1A1*28) is strongly associated with toxicity; however, this link is dose dependent. Variations in other pharmacokinetic genes, particularly the transporter ABCC2, also contribute to irinotecan toxicity. In addition, recent studies have shown that pharmacodynamic genes such as TDP1 and XRCC1 can also play a role in both toxicity and response.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, GeneticAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCamptothecinDose-Response Relationship, DrugForecastingGlucuronosyltransferaseHumansIrinotecanMultidrug Resistance-Associated Protein 2PharmacogeneticsUGT1A1 EnzymeABCC2 protein, humanAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCamptothecinGlucuronosyltransferaseIrinotecanMultidrug Resistance-Associated Protein 2UGT1A1 Enzyme

Identifiers

PMID20602618
PMCPMC2927346
OpenAlexW4231068650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.