ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2011
Postsurgery activation of dormant liver micrometastasis: a case report and review of literature.
Review in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breast cancer and the black swan.Ecancermedicalscience · 2020Review
- Lessons from Hippocrates: Time to Change the Cancer Paradigm.International journal of chronic diseases · 2020Review
- Non-randomness of the anatomical distribution of tumors.Cancer convergence · 2017Article
- [Metastasis of pancreatic tumors].Der Pathologe · 2015Review
- Reduction of breast cancer relapses with perioperative non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: new findings and a review.Current medicinal chemistry · 2013Review
- Promising development from translational or perhaps anti-translational research in breast cancer.Clinical and translational medicine · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe present the case of a 55-year-old woman who underwent a Whipple procedure for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The preoperative work-up showed no signs of liver metastasis and confirmed the patient's operability, but at less than 40 days postoperatively there were diffuse liver metastasis present on CT. This rapid evolution raises the question whether current staging systems are adequate in determining a patient's operability. It also suggests an interaction between the primary tumor and the host and the existence of disseminated tumor cells. DISCUSSION: In this article, we give an explanation for the clinical evolution presented in our case using the "integrated organ" and the "concomitant resistance" hypotheses. We believe that, if these theories continue to prove their viability, the search for disseminated tumor cells will be essential for good clinical practice in this type of pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20602181What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.