Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20601853›Full record

Trial reportAIDS (London, England)2010

Reducing HIV risk behavior of men who have sex with men through persuasive computing: results of the Men's INTernet Study-II.

B R Simon Rosser, J Michael Oakes, Joseph Konstan, Simon Hooper, Keith J Horvath, Gene P Danilenko, Katherine E Nygaard, Derek J Smolenski

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in AIDS (London, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Internet-based randomized controlled trials: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2013
    Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

B R Simon RosserHIV/STI Intervention and Prevention Studies, Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55454, USA. rosser@umn.edu
J Michael Oakes
Joseph Konstan
Simon Hooper
Keith J Horvath
Gene P Danilenko
Katherine E Nygaard
Derek J Smolenski

Funding

Men's INTernet Study II (MINTS-II) for HIV PreventionR01MH063688 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI ROSSER, B R SIMON · 2001 to 2014
$6.8M
NIMH NIH HHS 5R01-MH063688-05NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH063688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe primary objective of this study was to develop and test a highly interactive Internet-based HIV prevention intervention for men who have sex with men (MSM). MSM remain the group at highest risk for HIV/AIDS in the United States and similar countries. As the Internet becomes popular for seeking sex, online interventions to reduce sexual risk are critical. Given previous studies, a secondary objective was to demonstrate that good retention is possible in online trials.

designA randomized controlled trial with 3-month, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up design was employed.

methodsIn 2008, 650 participants were randomized to an online, interactive sexual risk reduction intervention or to a waitlist null control.

resultsRetention was 76-89% over 12 months. At 3-month follow-up, results showed a 16% reduction in reported unprotected anal intercourse risk among those in the treatment condition versus control [95% confidence interval (95% CI) of rate ratio: 0.70-1.01]. No meaningful differences were observed at 12-month follow-up.

conclusionInternet-based, persuasive computing programs hold promise as an effective new approach to HIV prevention for MSM, at least in the short term. Further, online trials can be conducted with acceptable retention provided strong retention protocols are employed. Four directions for future research are identified.

Indexed as

HIV-1InternetAdolescentAdultHarm ReductionHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersuasive CommunicationSexual BehaviorUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID20601853
PMCPMC3319361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.