Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20601514›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2010

Microbial community changes in response to ethanol or methanol amendments for U(VI) reduction.

Tatiana A Vishnivetskaya, Craig C Brandt, Andrew S Madden, Meghan M Drake, Joel E Kostka, Denise M Akob, Kirsten Küsel, Anthony V Palumbo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tatiana A VishnivetskayaOak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA.
Craig C Brandt
Andrew S Madden
Meghan M Drake
Joel E Kostka
Denise M Akob
Kirsten Küsel
Anthony V Palumbo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial community responses to ethanol, methanol, and methanol plus humics amendments in relationship to U(VI) bioreduction were studied in laboratory microcosm experiments using sediments and ground water from a uranium-contaminated site in Oak Ridge, TN. The type of carbon source added, the duration of incubation, and the sampling site influenced the bacterial community structure upon incubation. Analysis of 16S rRNA gene clone libraries indicated that (i) bacterial communities found in ethanol- and methanol-amended samples with U(VI) reduction were similar due to the presence of Deltaproteobacteria and Betaproteobacteria (members of the families Burkholderiaceae, Comamonadaceae, Oxalobacteraceae, and Rhodocyclaceae); (ii) methanol-amended samples without U(VI) reduction exhibited the lowest diversity and the bacterial community contained 69.2 to 92.8% of the family Methylophilaceae; and (iii) the addition of humics resulted in an increase of phylogenetic diversity of Betaproteobacteria (Rodoferax, Polaromonas, Janthinobacterium, Methylophilales, and unclassified) and Firmicutes (Desulfosporosinus and Clostridium).

Indexed as

BiodiversityBacteriaCarbonCluster AnalysisDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalEnvironmental PollutantsEthanolGeographyMethanolMolecular Sequence DataOxidation-ReductionPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNASoil MicrobiologyCarbonDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalEnvironmental PollutantsEthanolMethanolRNA, Ribosomal, 16SUranium

Identifiers

PMID20601514
PMCPMC2935046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.