Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20601500›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2010

Suitability of quantitative real-time PCR to estimate the biomass of fungal root endophytes.

Christoph Tellenbach, Christoph R Grünig, Thomas N Sieber

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Biocontrol ofToxins · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christoph TellenbachETH Zürich, Institute of Integrative Biology, Forest Pathology and Dendrology, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland. christoph.tellenbach@env.ethz.ch
Christoph R Grünig
Thomas N Sieber
ETH Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A nested single-copy locus-based quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay and a multicopy locus-based qPCR assay were developed to estimate endophytic biomass of fungal root symbionts belonging to the Phialocephala fortinii sensu lato-Acephala applanata species complex (PAC). Both assays were suitable for estimation of endophytic biomass, but the nested assay was more sensitive and specific for PAC. For mycelia grown in liquid cultures, the correlation between dry weight and DNA amount was strong and statistically significant for all three examined strains, allowing accurate prediction of fungal biomass by qPCR. For mycelia colonizing cellophane or Norway spruce roots, correlation between biomass estimated by qPCR and microscopy was strain dependent and was affected by the abundance of microsclerotia. Fungal biomass estimated by qPCR and microscopy correlated well for one strain with poor microsclerotia formation but not for two strains with high microsclerotia formation. The accuracy of qPCR measurement is constrained by the variability of cell volumes, while the accuracy of microscopy can be hampered by overlapping fungal structures and lack of specificity for PAC. Nevertheless, qPCR is preferable because it is highly specific for PAC and less time-consuming than quantification by microscopy. There is currently no better method than qPCR-based quantification using calibration curves obtained from pure mycelia to predict PAC biomass in substrates. In this study, the DNA amount of A. applanata extracted from 15 mm of Norway spruce fine root segments (mean diameter, 610 microm) varied between 0.3 and 45.5 ng, which corresponds to a PAC biomass of 5.1 +/- 4.5 microg (estimate +/- 95% prediction interval) and 418 +/- 264 microg.

Indexed as

BiomassSymbiosisAscomycotaCulture MediaDNA, FungalMicroscopyMyceliumMycologyPiceaPlant RootsPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityCulture MediaDNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID20601500
PMCPMC2935045
OpenAlexW1964921039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.