Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20601468›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2010

Analysis of RuvABC and RecG involvement in the escherichia coli response to the covalent topoisomerase-DNA complex.

Jeanette H Sutherland, Yuk-Ching Tse-Dinh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Replication Fork Breakage and Restart in Escherichia coli.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2018
    Review
  4. Replication Restart in Bacteria.Journal of bacteriology · 2017
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeanette H SutherlandDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York 10595, USA.
Yuk-Ching Tse-Dinh
New York Medical College · US

Funding

Bacterial cell killing topoisomerase I--DNA lesionR01AI069313 · NIAID · NEW YORK MEDICAL COLLEGE · PI TSE-DINH, YUK-CHING · 2006 to 2014
$3.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI 069313NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI069313
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Topoisomerases form a covalent enzyme-DNA intermediate after initial DNA cleavage. Trapping of the cleavage complex formed by type IIA topoisomerases initiates the bactericidal action of fluoroquinolones. It should be possible also to identify novel antibacterial lead compounds that act with a similar mechanism on type IA bacterial topoisomerases. The cellular response and repair pathways for trapped topoisomerase complexes remain to be fully elucidated. The RuvAB and RecG proteins could play a role in the conversion of the initial protein-DNA complex to double-strand breaks and also in the resolution of the Holliday junction during homologous recombination. Escherichia coli strains with ruvA and recG mutations are found to have increased sensitivity to low levels of norfloxacin treatment, but the mutations had more pronounced effects on survival following the accumulation of covalent complexes formed by mutant topoisomerase I defective in DNA religation. Covalent topoisomerase I and DNA gyrase complexes are converted into double-strand breaks for SOS induction by the RecBCD pathway. SOS induction following topoisomerase I complex accumulation is significantly lower in the ruvA and recG mutants than in the wild-type background, suggesting that RuvAB and RecG may play a role in converting the initial single-strand DNA-protein cleavage complex into a double-strand break prior to repair by homologous recombination. The use of a ruvB mutant proficient in homologous recombination but not in replication fork reversal demonstrated that the replication fork reversal function of RuvAB is required for SOS induction by the covalent complex formed by topoisomerase I.

Indexed as

DNA HelicasesEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsColony Count, MicrobialDNA, BacterialDNA GyraseDNA RepairDNA Topoisomerases, Type IEndodeoxyribonucleasesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMutationNorfloxacinRecombination, GeneticSOS Response, GeneticsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialDNA GyraseDNA HelicasesDNA Topoisomerases, Type IEndodeoxyribonucleasesEscherichia coli ProteinsHolliday junction DNA helicase, E coliNorfloxacinRecG protein, E coliRuvB protein, BacteriaruvC protein, E coli

Identifiers

PMID20601468
PMCPMC2937393
OpenAlexW2121031761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.