Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20600675›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2010

Differential effects of selective adenosine antagonists on the effort-related impairments induced by dopamine D1 and D2 antagonism.

E J Nunes, P A Randall, J L Santerre, A B Given, T N Sager, M Correa, J D Salamone

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Adenosine AFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Vigor, Effort-Related Aspects of Motivation and Anhedonia.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Neuronal adenosine AScientific reports · 2020
    Article
  16. Blockade of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors facilitates motivated behaviour and rescues a model of antipsychotic-induced amotivation.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019
    Article
  17. Effects of adenosine APsychopharmacology · 2019
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

E J NunesDepartment of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-1020, USA.
P A Randall
J L Santerre
A B Given
T N Sager
M Correa
J D Salamone
University of Connecticut · USLundbeck (Denmark) · DKUniversitat Jaume I · ES

Funding

Effort-related Functions of Nucleus Accumbens Adenosine A2A ReceptorsR01MH078023 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI SALAMONE, JOHN D · 2007 to 2010
$835k
NIMH NIH HHS MH078023NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH078023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesolimbic dopamine (DA) is a critical component of the brain circuitry regulating behavioral activation and effort-related processes. Rats with impaired DA transmission reallocate their instrumental behavior away from food-reinforced tasks with high response requirements, and instead select less effortful food-seeking behaviors. Previous work showed that adenosine A(2A) antagonists can reverse the effects of DA D(2) antagonists on effort-related choice. However, less is known about the effects of adenosine A(1) antagonists. Despite anatomical data showing that A(1) and D(1) receptors are co-localized on the same striatal neurons, it is uncertain if A(1) antagonists can reverse the effects DA D(1) antagonists. The present work systematically compared the ability of adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptor antagonists to reverse the effects of DA D(1) and D(2) antagonists on a concurrent lever pressing/feeding choice task. With this procedure, rats can choose between responding on a fixed ratio 5 lever-pressing schedule for a highly preferred food (i.e. high carbohydrate pellets) vs. approaching and consuming a less preferred rodent chow. The D(1) antagonist ecopipam (0.2 mg/kg i.p.) and the D(2) antagonist eticlopride (0.08 mg/kg i.p.) altered choice behavior, reducing lever pressing and increasing lab chow intake. Co-administration of the adenosine A(1) receptor antagonists 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX; 0.375, 0.75, and 1.5 mg/kg i.p.), and 8-cyclopentyltheophylline (CPT; 3.0, 6.0, 12.0 mg/kg i.p.) failed to reverse the effects of either the D(1) or D(2) antagonist. In contrast, the adenosine A(2A) antagonist KW-6002 (0.125, 0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg i.p.) was able to produce a robust reversal of the effects of eticlopride, as well as a mild partial reversal of the effects of ecopipam. Adenosine A(2A) and DA D(2) receptors interact to regulate effort-related choice behavior, which may have implications for the treatment of psychiatric symptoms such as psychomotor slowing, fatigue or anergia that can be observed in depression and other disorders.

Indexed as

Dopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistsAnimalsDopamine AntagonistsDose-Response Relationship, DrugFeeding BehaviorMalePsychomotor PerformancePurinergic P1 Receptor AntagonistsRandom AllocationRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, Dopamine D1Receptors, Dopamine D2Reinforcement ScheduleDopamine AntagonistsDopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistsPurinergic P1 Receptor AntagonistsReceptors, Dopamine D1Receptors, Dopamine D2

Identifiers

PMID20600675
PMCPMC3268040
OpenAlexW2081647710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.