ArticleVaccine2010
Protection against pneumonic plague following oral immunization with a non-replicating vaccine.
Article in Vaccine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Immune Nanoparticles for Rapid and Non-Specific Activation of Antiviral and Antibacterial Immune Responses in Cattle, Swine, and Poultry.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Article
- Local immune and microbiological responses to mucosal administration of a Liposome-TLR agonist immunotherapeutic in dogs.BMC veterinary research · 2019Article
- Article
- Plague Vaccine Development: Current Research and Future Trends.Frontiers in immunology · 2016Review
- Liposomes as vaccine delivery systems: a review of the recent advances.Therapeutic advances in vaccines · 2014Review
- Vaccine Potentiation by Combination Adjuvants.Vaccines · 2014Review
- Immune responses to plague infection in wild Rattus rattus, in Madagascar: a role in foci persistence?PloS one · 2012Article
- Intranasal administration of an inactivated Yersinia pestis vaccine with interleukin-12 generates protective immunity against pneumonic plague.Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI · 2011Article
- Mucosal immunization with liposome-nucleic acid adjuvants generates effective humoral and cellular immunity.Vaccine · 2011Article
- Plague: Infections of Companion Animals and Opportunities for Intervention.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Yersinia pestis is a dangerous bacterial pathogen that when inhaled can rapidly induce fatal pneumonic plague. Thus, there is a need for stable, safe, and easily administered mucosal vaccines capable of eliciting effective protection against pulmonary Y. pestis infections. Cationic liposome-nucleic acid complexes (CLDC) have been shown previously to be effective vaccine adjuvants for parenteral immunization, but have not been previously evaluated for use in oral immunization. Therefore, we investigated the ability of an orally administered CLDC adjuvanted vaccine to elicit protective immunity against lethal pneumonic plague. C57Bl/6 mice were vaccinated orally or subcutaneously using 10mug Y. pestis F1 antigen combined with CLDC and immune responses and protection from challenge was assessed. We found that oral immunization elicited high titers of anti-F1 antibodies, equivalent to those generated by parenteral immunization. Importantly, orally immunized mice were protected from lethal pulmonary challenge with virulent Y. pestis for up to 18 weeks following vaccination. Vaccine-induced protection following oral immunization was found to be dependent primarily on CD4+ T cells, with a partial contribution from CD8+ T cells. Thus, CLDC adjuvanted vaccines represent a new type of orally administered, non-replicating vaccine capable of generating effective protection against pulmonary infection with virulent Y. pestis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.