Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20600107›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2010

Action of the chaperonin GroEL/ES on a non-native substrate observed with single-molecule FRET.

So Yeon Kim, Erik J Miller, Judith Frydman, W E Moerner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Subunit conformational variation within individual GroEL oligomers resolved by Cryo-EM.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Single-molecule resolution of protein structure and interfacial dynamics on biomaterial surfaces.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

So Yeon KimDepartment of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Erik J Miller
Judith Frydman
W E Moerner
Stanford University · US

Funding

Center for Protein Folding Machinery (RMI)PN2EY016525 · NEI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI CHIU, WAH · 2005 to 2015
$33.6M
Mechanism of the Eukaryotic Chaperonin TRiC/CCTR01GM074074 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FRYDMAN, JUDITH · 2005 to 2024
$6.8M
Single-Molecule Studies of Chaperonin MechanismR21GM075166 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MOERNER, WILLIAM E · 2005 to 2006
$366k
Center for Protein Folding Machinery (RMI)PN1EY016525 · NEI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI CHIU, WAH · 2004 to 2004
$67k
NEI NIH HHS PN2 EY016525NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074074NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM74074NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM075166
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The double ring-shaped chaperonin GroEL binds a wide range of non-native polypeptides within its central cavity and, together with its cofactor GroES, assists their folding in an ATP-dependent manner. The conformational cycle of GroEL/ES has been studied extensively but little is known about how the environment in the central cavity affects substrate conformation. Here, we use the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein VHL as a model substrate for studying the action of the GroEL/ES system on a bound polypeptide. Fluorescent labeling of pairs of sites on VHL for fluorescence (Förster) resonant energy transfer (FRET) allows VHL to be used to explore how GroEL binding and GroEL/ES/nucleotide binding affect the substrate conformation. On average, upon binding to GroEL, all pairs of labeling sites experience compaction relative to the unfolded protein while single-molecule FRET distributions show significant heterogeneity. Upon addition of GroES and ATP to close the GroEL cavity, on average further FRET increases occur between the two hydrophobic regions of VHL, accompanied by FRET decreases between the N- and C-termini. This suggests that ATP- and GroES-induced confinement within the GroEL cavity remodels bound polypeptides by causing expansion (or racking) of some regions and compaction of others, most notably, the hydrophobic core. However, single-molecule observations of the specific FRET changes for individual proteins at the moment of ATP/GroES addition reveal that a large fraction of the population shows the opposite behavior; that is, FRET decreases between the hydrophobic regions and FRET increases for the N- and C-termini. Our time-resolved single-molecule analysis reveals the underlying heterogeneity of the action of GroES/EL on a bound polypeptide substrate, which might arise from the random nature of the specific binding to the various identical subunits of GroEL, and might help explain why multiple rounds of binding and hydrolysis are required for some chaperonin substrates.

Indexed as

Binding SitesChaperonin 10Chaperonin 60Energy TransferFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferHydrolysisModels, MolecularProtein ConformationSubstrate SpecificityChaperonin 10Chaperonin 60

Identifiers

PMID20600107
PMCPMC2927214
OpenAlexW2081416761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.