ArticleJournal of molecular biology2010
Action of the chaperonin GroEL/ES on a non-native substrate observed with single-molecule FRET.
Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- smFRET Detection of Cis and Trans DNA Interactions by the BfiI Restriction Endonuclease.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2023Article
- pVHL-mediated SMAD3 degradation suppresses TGF-β signaling.The Journal of cell biology · 2022Article
- Subunit conformational variation within individual GroEL oligomers resolved by Cryo-EM.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- Article
- Mechanisms of cellular proteostasis: insights from single-molecule approaches.Annual review of biophysics · 2014Review
- Single-molecule resolution of protein structure and interfacial dynamics on biomaterial surfaces.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013Article
- Repetitive protein unfolding by the trans ring of the GroEL-GroES chaperonin complex stimulates folding.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2013Article
- Nucleotide-induced conformational changes of tetradecameric GroEL mapped by H/D exchange monitored by FT-ICR mass spectrometry.Scientific reports · 2013Article
- Live-cell imaging of single receptor composition using zero-mode waveguide nanostructures.Nano letters · 2012Article
- Single Molecule Analysis Research Tool (SMART): an integrated approach for analyzing single molecule data.PloS one · 2012Article
- Functional Subunits of Eukaryotic Chaperonin CCT/TRiC in Protein Folding.Journal of amino acids · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The double ring-shaped chaperonin GroEL binds a wide range of non-native polypeptides within its central cavity and, together with its cofactor GroES, assists their folding in an ATP-dependent manner. The conformational cycle of GroEL/ES has been studied extensively but little is known about how the environment in the central cavity affects substrate conformation. Here, we use the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein VHL as a model substrate for studying the action of the GroEL/ES system on a bound polypeptide. Fluorescent labeling of pairs of sites on VHL for fluorescence (Förster) resonant energy transfer (FRET) allows VHL to be used to explore how GroEL binding and GroEL/ES/nucleotide binding affect the substrate conformation. On average, upon binding to GroEL, all pairs of labeling sites experience compaction relative to the unfolded protein while single-molecule FRET distributions show significant heterogeneity. Upon addition of GroES and ATP to close the GroEL cavity, on average further FRET increases occur between the two hydrophobic regions of VHL, accompanied by FRET decreases between the N- and C-termini. This suggests that ATP- and GroES-induced confinement within the GroEL cavity remodels bound polypeptides by causing expansion (or racking) of some regions and compaction of others, most notably, the hydrophobic core. However, single-molecule observations of the specific FRET changes for individual proteins at the moment of ATP/GroES addition reveal that a large fraction of the population shows the opposite behavior; that is, FRET decreases between the hydrophobic regions and FRET increases for the N- and C-termini. Our time-resolved single-molecule analysis reveals the underlying heterogeneity of the action of GroES/EL on a bound polypeptide substrate, which might arise from the random nature of the specific binding to the various identical subunits of GroEL, and might help explain why multiple rounds of binding and hydrolysis are required for some chaperonin substrates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.