ReviewThe Psychiatric clinics of North America2010
The effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy for personality disorders.
Review in The Psychiatric clinics of North America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cognitive-behavioural therapy for a variety of conditions: an overview of systematic reviews and panoramic meta-analysis.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2021Pooled it
- Systematic review of randomized controlled trials for chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME).Journal of translational medicine · 2020Pooled it
- A systematic review of depression psychotherapies among Latinos.Clinical psychology review · 2016Pooled it
- When Adverse Experiences Influence the Interpretation of Ourselves, Others and the World: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Maladaptive Schemas in Victims of Violence.Clinical psychology & psychotherapyPooled it
- Trial
- Affect before diagnosis: applying affective neuroscience to psychiatry.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Pharmacotherapy for comorbid antisocial personality and obsessive-compulsive disorder: A case report.Psychiatry research case reports · 2023Article
- A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Self-Attachment to Treat Chronic Anxiety and/or Depression in Iranian Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Borderline Personality Disorder "Discouraged Type": A Case Report.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Type D Personality and Stomatognathic System Disorders in Physiotherapy Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Treatment of personality pathology through the lens of the hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology: Developing a research agenda.Personality and mental health · 2020Article
- [Forensic preventive assertive community treatment : Pilot project to prevent violent crimes in the context of psychiatric disorders].Der Nervenarzt · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This article provides a comprehensive review of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) treatments for personality disorders (PDs), including a description of the available treatments and empirical support, drawing on research published between 1980 and 2009. Research generally supports the conclusion that CBT is an effective treatment modality for reducing symptoms and enhancing functional outcomes among patients with PDs, thereby making it a useful framework for clinicians working with patients with PD symptomatology. There is a clear need, however, to develop and evaluate CBT in order to provide specific and more unambiguous treatment recommendations with particular relevance for understudied PDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.