Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20598836›Full record

Trial reportJournal of substance abuse treatment2010

Antidepressant treatment does not improve buprenorphine retention among opioid-dependent persons.

Michael D Stein, Debra S Herman, Malyna Kettavong, Patricia A Cioe, Peter D Friedmann, Tahir Tellioglu, Bradley J Anderson

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of substance abuse treatment, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pharmacological interventions for drug-using offenders.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michael D SteinBrown University, Butler Hospital, General Medicine Research, Providence, RI 02906, USA. michael_stein@brown.edu
Debra S Herman
Malyna Kettavong
Patricia A Cioe
Peter D Friedmann
Tahir Tellioglu
Bradley J Anderson
Providence College · USButler Hospital · USBrown University · USRhode Island Hospital · US

Funding

Antidepressants During Office-based BuprenorphineR01DA022207 · NIDA · RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL · PI STEIN, MICHAEL D · 2006 to 2008
$1.0M
MIDCAREER INVESTIGATOR AWARD IN SUBSTANCE ABUSE RESEARCHK24DA000512 · NIDA · RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL (PROVIDENCE, RI) · PI STEIN, MICHAEL D · 2001 to 2010
$982k
DISCOVERY OF NOVEL MOLECULAR TARGETS FOR ENDOGENOUS AND SYNTHETIC CANNABINOIDSZ01DA000512 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI SHIPPENBERG, TONI · 2007 to 2008
$189k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 DA000512NIDA NIH HHS DA022207NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA000512NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA022207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our goal was to determine whether treatment of depressive symptoms with escitalopram during buprenorphine treatment for opioid dependence would improve treatment retention compared to placebo in a 12-week, randomized, double-blind trial. Treatment dropout was defined as missing seven consecutive buprenorphine dosing days. Participants were 76% male, 80% non-Hispanic Caucasian, and 64% heroin users. At baseline, the mean Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) score was 28.4 (+/-9.7). Sixty-one percent of participants completed the 12-week buprenorphine protocol. Dropout rates were 33.3% and 44.0% among those randomized to escitalopram or placebo, respectively (p = .19). Relative to baseline, mean BDI-II scores were significantly lower at all follow-up assessments, but the Treatment x Time interaction effect was not statistically significant (p = .18). Participants randomized to escitalopram also did not have a significantly lower likelihood of testing positive for either opiates or other drugs during follow-up. Depressive symptoms often resolved with buprenorphine treatment, and the immediate initiation of escitalopram does not improve treatment retention, depression outcomes, or illicit drug use. Clinicians should determine the need for antidepressant treatment later in buprenorphine care.

Indexed as

AdultAntidepressive AgentsBuprenorphineCitalopramDepressionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNarcotic AntagonistsOpioid-Related DisordersAntidepressive AgentsBuprenorphineCitalopramNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID20598836
PMCPMC2910850
OpenAlexW1989144692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.