Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20597043›Full record

ReviewPlanta medica2010

Role of phytoestrogens in cancer therapy.

Mandeep K Virk-Baker, Tim R Nagy, Stephen Barnes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Planta medica, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Effect of isopsoralen on Smad7 in osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mandeep K Virk-BakerDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
Tim R Nagy
Stephen Barnes

Funding

Cancer Prevention & Control Training ProgramR25CA047888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI DEMARK-WAHNEFRIED, WENDY, MENESES, KAREN M · 1988 to 2016
$11.2M
Center for Nutrient-Gene Interaction in Cancer PreventionU54CA100949 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BARNES, STEPHEN · 2003 to 2008
$9.7M
Urinary peptide excretion and onset of pubertyR21AT004661 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BARNES, STEPHEN · 2008 to 2009
$543k
NCCIH NIH HHS R21 AT004661NCCIH NIH HHS R21 AT04661NCI NIH HHS R25 CA047888NCI NIH HHS U54 CA100949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide, and the numbers of new cancer cases are expected to continue to rise. The main goals of cancer therapy include removing the primary tumor, preventing the spread of distant metastases, and improving survival and quality of life for the patients. To attain these goals of cancer therapy, the combination of different chemotherapeutics, as opposed to the conventional single-agent treatment, is an emerging area of research. Given the potential risks of drug toxicity in such treatment, the focus is to have a second compound that increases the anticancer potential of the primary agent but which reduces toxicity. There is an ever growing interest in treatment with natural compounds, such as plant phytoestrogens, as an adjuvant cancer therapy along with conventional cancer therapy. The question remains whether or not adding these compounds to the cancer therapy regimen as a second agent would be beneficial, and if they are safe to be used among cancer patients. The current literature suggests that phytoestrogen treatment is capable of inducing G2/M cell cycle arrest in a number of cancer cell lines, as well as upregulating cell cycle inhibitory molecules. Phytoestrogen therapy has been shown to inhibit inflammation, angiogenesis and metastases in various IN VIVO tumor models, and pronounced benefits have been observed when combined with radiation therapy. The lack of side effects from phase I and II clinical trials of phytoestrogens in cancer therapy points towards their safety, but to further understand their added benefit clinical studies with large sample sizes are required. We have reviewed the recent research studies in these areas in an attempt to find evidence for their role in cancer therapy as well as safety.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCell CycleChemotherapy, AdjuvantHumansInflammationIsoflavonesLignansMiceNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsNeovascularization, PathologicPhytoestrogensRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicIsoflavonesLignansPhytoestrogens

Identifiers

PMID20597043
PMCPMC3800092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.