ArticleAccountability in research2010
Balancing scientific and community interests in community-based participatory research.
Article in Accountability in research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03432143 (Community Members as Reviewers of Medical Journal Manuscripts), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Community Members as Reviewers of Medical Journal Manuscripts
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patients' Associations as Co-Creators of Knowledge: Insights From a Community-Based Participatory Research Study (ProSafe Project).Health science reports · 2026Article
- Engaging people with lived experience of psychological disorders: Current research and future directions for community-engaged measure development in psychological science.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025Article
- Equitable community-based participatory research engagement with communities of color drives All of Us Wisconsin genomic research priorities.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Inclusionary Trials: A Review of Lessons Not Learned.Epidemiologic reviews · 2022Review
- Addressing Health Disparities Through Deliberative Methods: Citizens' Panels for Health Equity.American journal of public health · 2020Article
- Citizen Scientists as Human Subjects: Ethical Issues.Citizen science : theory and practice · 2019Article
- Increasing Research Capacity in Underserved Communities: Formative and Summative Evaluation of the Mississippi Community Research Fellows Training Program (Cohort 1).Frontiers in public health · 2018Review
- Partnering with African American Churches to Create a Community Coalition for Mental Health.Ethnicity & disease · 2018Article
- The Role of Intuition in Risk/Benefit Decision-Making in Human Subjects Research.Accountability in research · 2017Article
- Empowering Change Agents in Hierarchical Organizations: Participatory Action Research in Prisons.Research in nursing & health · 2016Article
- The Ethical Challenges of Socially Responsible Science.Accountability in research · 2016Article
- Case Study of an Unsustainable Community-Academic Partnership: Toward Core Standards for the Structure of Emerging Participatory Research.Ethnicity & disease · 2015Article
- Sharing of grant funds between academic institutions and community partners in community-based participatory research.Clinical and translational science · 2014Article
- Article
- Variation in the interpretation of scientific integrity in community-based participatory health research.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2013Article
- Nutrition research in rural communities: application of ethical principles.Maternal & child nutrition · 2013Review
- Conducting research with tribal communities: sovereignty, ethics, and data-sharing issues.Environmental health perspectives · 2012Article
- Health Communication Film Implementation Strategy COVID-19-era: The Turning T.I.D.E. in HIV Multimedia Research.Journal of social work and welfare policyArticle
- Integrating classroom, community, mixed-methods research, and community-based participatory research to teach public health practice.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Community-based participatory research is an approach to studying human populations that emphasizes extensive partnerships between researchers and community members. While there are many advantages of this approach, it also faces a number of conceptual and practical challenges, one of which is managing the conflict that sometimes arises between promoting scientific and community interests. This essay explores the potential conflict between scientific and community interests in several different stages of community-based participatory research, including research design, data interpretation, and publication, and makes some suggestions for practice and policy. To manage potential conflicts between scientific and community interests, investigators and community partners should enter into written agreements at the beginning of the study. In some cases, it may be necessary for a third party, such as a review committee from a supporting institution, the community, or a funding agency, to help investigators and community partners resolve disagreements. It may also be useful, in some situations, to publish a dissenting opinion when investigators and community partners cannot agree on how to interpret findings resulting from a study. These strategies may help address some of the challenges of implementing community-based participatory research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.