Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20596775›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2010

The detection of "Candidatus Mycoplasma haemobos" in cattle and buffalo in China.

Q L Su, H Q Song, R Q Lin, Z G Yuan, J F Yang, G H Zhao, W Y Huang, Xing Quan Zhu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Q L SuGuangxi Veterinary Research Institute, 51 Youai Bei Road, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Nationality Autonomous Region, 530001, People's Republic of China.
H Q Song
R Q Lin
Z G Yuan
J F Yang
G H Zhao
W Y Huang
Xing Quan Zhu
South China Agricultural University · CNGuangxi University · CNGuangxi Veterinary Research Institute · CNLanzhou Veterinary Research Institute · CNYunnan Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

"Candidatus Mycoplasma haemobos" is a hemoplasma species found in cattle and has been recently reported in Switzerland and Japan. In this study, "Candidatus Mycoplasma haemobos" was shown to occur in cattle and buffalo in tropical China by PCR amplification and sequence analysis of the 16S rRNA gene from blood samples. Based on the 16S rDNA sequence, a specific PCR assay was developed. Occurrence of "Candidatus Mycoplasma haemobos" in cattle and buffalo in Guangxi, China, was determined by examining 25 buffalo blood samples, 12 yellow cattle blood samples and 42 dairy cow blood samples. The results showed that 32% (8/25) of buffalo, 41.7% (5/12) of yellow cattle, and 14.3% (6/42) of dairy cows were positive for "Candidatus Mycoplasma haemobos", respectively. Direct sequencing of representative PCR products confirmed that the amplified partial 16S rDNA sequence represented "Candidatus Mycoplasma haemobos". This is the first report of "Candidatus Mycoplasma haemobos" in buffalo, yellow cattle, and dairy cows in China.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceBuffaloesCattleCattle DiseasesChinaCloning, MolecularDNA PrimersMolecular Sequence DataMycoplasmaMycoplasma InfectionsPolymerase Chain ReactionPrevalenceRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNADNA PrimersRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID20596775
OpenAlexW2029936461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.