Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20596688›Full record

ReviewDer Internist2010

[The patient with pulmonary embolism or vascular emergency requiring intensive care].

S M Schellong

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Internist, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

S M SchellongMedizinische Klinik, Krankenhaus Dresden-Friedrichstadt, Friedrichstrasse 41, 01067, Dresden, Germany. schellong-se@khdf.de

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute pulmonary embolism requires ICU management only for patients with hemodynamic instability who need artificial ventilation, or for hemodynamically stable patients with significant right ventricular dysfunction. For both patient groups, echocardiography is the most relevant diagnostic method. The main therapeutic consideration is on systemic thrombolysis. It is indicated in almost all patients with hemodynamic instability but only in selected cases of right ventricular dysfunction. All other patients receive standard anticoagulation only. A second vascular emergency scenario is type 2 heparin-induced thrombocytopeniae (HIT II) which may cause venous as well as arterial complications. Alternative anticoagulation has to be established from the first moment of clinical suspicion. It has to be continued in a therapeutic dosage if HIT II is confirmed, and has to be stopped if the diagnosis is refuted. The latter case is by far more frequent. Regarding arterial occlusions (acute limb ischemia, acral gangrene, iatrogenic vascular trauma) hints are given for the management in the setting of intensive care.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalIntensive Care UnitsAnticoagulantsCombined Modality TherapyEchocardiographyHeparinHumansPulmonary EmbolismRespiration, ArtificialThrombocytopeniaThrombolytic TherapyVascular DiseasesVentricular Dysfunction, RightAnticoagulantsHeparin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.