Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20596581›Full record

ReviewIntegrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro2010

Modeling tumor growth and treatment response based on quantitative imaging data.

Thomas E Yankeelov, Nkiruka C Atuegwu, Natasha G Deane, John C Gore

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Serial diffusion MRI to monitor and model treatment response of the targeted nanotherapy CRLX101.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2013
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas E YankeelovInstitute of Imaging Science, 1161 21st Avenue South, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37212-2310, USA.
Nkiruka C Atuegwu
Natasha G Deane
John C Gore

Funding

Vanderbilt In Vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging CenterP50CA128323 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GORE, JOHN C · 2008 to 2012
$6.8M
MRI Diffusion in Tumors Using Oscillating GradientsR01CA109106 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI XU, JUNZHONG · 2006 to 2022
$4.0M
PROTON RELAXATION AND CONTRAST MECHANISMS IN MRIR01EB000214 · NIBIB · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GORE, JOHN C · 2002 to 2008
$2.1M
MRI Evaluation of Tumor Growth and Treatment ResponseK25EB005936 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI YANKEELOV, THOMAS E · 2005 to 2009
$735k
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA128323NCI NIH HHS R01 CA109106NIBIB NIH HHS 1K25EB005936NIBIB NIH HHS 5 R01 EB000214NIBIB NIH HHS K25 EB005936NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB000214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We review current approaches to predicting tumor growth and treatment response that combine non-invasive imaging data with mathematical models of cancer progression, and propose some new directions for integrating quantitative imaging measurements with such numerical analyses. Historically, tumor modeling has been described by parameters that are measurable by invasive methods only or in isolated in vitro or ex vivo systems. This limits the practical usefulness of such models because it is not possible to test their predictions experimentally. Recent advances in three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging, single photon emission computed tomography, and positron emission tomography techniques provide new opportunities to acquire measurements of relevant molecular and cellular features of tumors non-invasively and with high spatial resolution. Such data can be incorporated into mathematical models of tumors. We highlight some recent examples of this approach and identify several simple examples that allow for conventional mathematical models of tumor growth to be recast in terms of parameters that can be measured by imaging, thus raising the possibility of designing and constraining models that can be tested in clinical practice. It is our hope that this Perspective will stimulate further work in this evolving and exciting field.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsCell ProliferationComputer SimulationHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedNeoplasmsTherapy, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID20596581
PMCPMC3919677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.