ArticlePloS one2010
Rapid and sensitive detection of Yersinia pestis using amplification of plague diagnostic bacteriophages monitored by real-time PCR.
Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plagued by the Past, Pressed by the Present: A One Health Perspective onBiomedicines · 2025Review
- Development of Effective Medical Countermeasures Against the Main Biowarfare Agents: The Importance of Antibodies.Microorganisms · 2024Review
- Advances in aptamer-based biosensors for monitoring foodborne pathogens.Journal of food science and technology · 2024Review
- InducedFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Advances in detection methods for viable Salmonella spp.: current applications and challenges.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2023Review
- Article
- Applications of polymerase chain reaction-based methods for the diagnosis of plague (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022Review
- Identification and Characterization of vB_PreP_EPr2, a Lytic Bacteriophage of Pan-Drug ResistantViruses · 2022Article
- Phage Amplification Assay for Detection of Mycobacterial Infection: A Review.Microorganisms · 2021Review
- Yersinia pestis: the Natural History of Plague.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2020Review
- Review
- Specific Detection ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Methods for detection of viable foodborne pathogens: current state-of-art and future prospects.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Phage-Mediated Molecular Detection (PMMD): A Novel Rapid Method for Phage-Specific Bacterial Detection.Viruses · 2020Article
- A novel flow cytometry assay based on bacteriophage-derived proteins for Staphylococcus detection in blood.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Highly Sensitive Bacteriophage-Based Detection of Brucella abortus in Mixed Culture and Spiked Blood.Viruses · 2017Article
- Bacteriophage-based tools: recent advances and novel applications.F1000Research · 2016Review
- Application of bacteriophages for detection of foodborne pathogens.Bacteriophage · 2014Review
- Can phage effectively treat multidrug-resistant plague?Bacteriophage · 2012Article
- Phage-based platforms for the clinical detection of human bacterial pathogens.Bacteriophage · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundYersinia pestis, the agent of plague, has caused many millions of human deaths and still poses a serious threat to global public health. Timely and reliable detection of such a dangerous pathogen is of critical importance. Lysis by specific bacteriophages remains an essential method of Y. pestis detection and plague diagnostics. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsThe objective of this work was to develop an alternative to conventional phage lysis tests--a rapid and highly sensitive method of indirect detection of live Y. pestis cells based on quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) monitoring of amplification of reporter Y. pestis-specific bacteriophages. Plague diagnostic phages phiA1122 and L-413C were shown to be highly effective diagnostic tools for the detection and identification of Y. pestis by using qPCR with primers specific for phage DNA. The template DNA extraction step that usually precedes qPCR was omitted. phiA1122-specific qPCR enabled the detection of an initial bacterial concentration of 10(3) CFU/ml (equivalent to as few as one Y. pestis cell per 1-microl sample) in four hours. L-413C-mediated detection of Y. pestis was less sensitive (up to 100 bacteria per sample) but more specific, and thus we propose parallel qPCR for the two phages as a rapid and reliable method of Y. pestis identification. Importantly, phiA1122 propagated in simulated clinical blood specimens containing EDTA and its titer rise was detected by both a standard plating test and qPCR. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Thus, we developed a novel assay for detection and identification of Y. pestis using amplification of specific phages monitored by qPCR. The method is simple, rapid, highly sensitive, and specific and allows the detection of only live bacteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.