ReviewJournal of human hypertension2011
How early should blood pressure control be achieved for optimal cardiovascular outcomes?
Review in Journal of human hypertension, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of a Single-Pill Triple Combination of Valsartan, Amlodipine, and Chlorthalidone in Patients With Essential Hypertension Inadequately Controlled on Dual Therapy With Valsartan and Amlodipine: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Phase 3 Trial.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2026Trial
- Nifedipine plus candesartan combination increases blood pressure control regardless of race and improves the side effect profile: DISTINCT randomized trial results.Journal of hypertension · 2014Trial
- Predictors of time to blood pressure control among hypertensive patients in pastoral communities of the Afar region, Northeastern Ethiopia.Global epidemiology · 2026Article
- Hypertensive Heart Failure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Initial Antihypertensive Regimens in Newly Treated Patients: Real World Evidence From the OneFlorida+ Clinical Research Network.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Hypertension management initiative prospective cohort study: comparison between immediate and delayed intervention groups.Journal of human hypertension · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As a consequence of the aging population and the increasing prevalence rates for conditions such as type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD), management of hypertension will be focusing more and more on the high-risk patient. Clinical practice guidelines for managing hypertension in the United States recommend a target blood pressure (BP) <130/80 mm Hg in patients with diabetes or CKD, notably lower than the 140/90-mm Hg threshold for the general hypertensive population. However, the optimal timeframe from initiation of antihypertensive therapy to attaining these levels of BP control and influencing cardiovascular outcomes is not as well defined. Overall, a series of landmark BP intervention trials in patients with hypertension and additional cardiovascular risk factors collectively support that achieving prompt BP control, ideally within 1-3 months, translates into improved cardiovascular outcomes. Although the consistency of the findings is encouraging, the strength of this conclusion is limited by the available data, which were derived from studies not designed to determine the definition or benefits of early BP reduction. In several of these studies, using a treatment approach with initial monotherapy or combination therapy has clearly demonstrated pronounced BP lowering and high BP control rates within an intensive timeframe of 3-6 months of therapy. Although these studies were not conducted exclusively in high-risk patients, subgroup analyses have demonstrated that the observed outcomes in the overall study populations apply to the diabetic and CKD subsets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.