Genetic technologies. Synthetic "life," ethics, national security, and public discourse.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Toward a Predictive Understanding of Earth's Microbiomes to Address 21st Century Challenges.mBio · 2016
   Article
2. Embodied artificial evolution: Artificial evolutionary systems in the 21st Century.Evolutionary intelligence · 2012
   Article
3. The sense of responsibility in the context of professional activities in Medical Genetics.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2011
   Article
4. Dual-use research and technological diffusion: reconsidering the bioterrorism threat spectrum.PLoS pathogens · 2011
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Creation of a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesized genome.2010

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as