Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20595398›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2010

Pathologies associated with the p53 response.

Andrei V Gudkov, Elena A Komarova

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The regulatory roles of p53 in cardiovascular health and disease.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Taking up the reins of power: metabolic functions of p53.Journal of molecular cell biology · 2019
    Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrei V GudkovDepartment of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York 14263, USA. andrei.gudkov@roswellpark.org
Elena A Komarova
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

MODULATORS OF P53 EXPRESSION AND FUNCTIONR01CA075179 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI GUDKOV, ANDREI V · 1997 to 2007
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS CA75179NCI NIH HHS R01 CA075179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although p53 is a major cancer preventive factor, under certain extreme stress conditions it may induce severe pathologies. Analyses of animal models indicate that p53 is largely responsible for the toxicity of ionizing radiation or DNA damaging drugs contributing to hematopoietic component of acute radiation syndrome and largely determining severe adverse effects of cancer treatment. p53-mediated damage is strictly tissue specific and occurs in tissues prone to p53-dependent apoptosis (e.g., hematopoietic system and hair follicles); on the contrary, p53 can serve as a survival factor in tissues that respond to p53 activation by cell cycle arrest (e.g., endothelium of small intestine). There are multiple experimental indications that p53 contributes to pathogenicity of acute ischemic diseases. Temporary reversible suppression of p53 by small molecules can be an effective and safe approach to reduce severity of p53-associated pathologies.

Indexed as

DiseaseAgingAnimalsGastrointestinal TractHumansInflammationIschemiaMiceRadiation ToleranceTumor Suppressor Protein p53Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID20595398
PMCPMC2890204
OpenAlexW2113880766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.