Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20595369›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2010

Assessment of craniospinal pressure-volume indices.

A Wåhlin, K Ambarki, R Birgander, N Alperin, J Malm, A Eklund

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Pediatric low-pressure hydrocephalus: a case series and re-analysis of a rare disease.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Does the brain have mechanical compliance?Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Enhanced in vitro model of the CSF dynamics.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A WåhlinDepartment of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. anders.wahlin@radfys.umu.se
K Ambarki
R Birgander
N Alperin
J Malm
A Eklund
University Hospital of Umeå · SECentre for Biomedical Engineering and Physics · SEUmeå University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe PVI(CC) of the craniospinal compartment defines the shape of the pressure-volume curve and determines the damping of cyclic arterial pulsations. Despite no reports of direct measurements of the PVI(CC) among healthy elderly, it is believed that a change away from adequate accommodation of cardiac-related pulsations may be a pathophysiologic mechanism seen in neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer disease and idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. In this study, blood and CSF flow measurements are combined with lumbar CSF infusion measurements to assess the craniospinal PVI(CC) and its distribution of cranial and spinal compartments in healthy elderly. MATERIALS AND

methodsThirty-seven healthy elderly were included (60-82 years of age). The cyclic arterial volume change and the resulting shift of CSF to the spinal compartment were quantified by PC-MR imaging. In addition, each subject underwent a lumbar CSF infusion test in which the magnitude of cardiac-related pulsations in intracranial pressure was quantified. Finally, the PVI was calculated by using a mathematic model.

resultsAfter excluding 2 extreme values, the craniospinal PVI(CC) was calculated to a mean of 9.8 ± 2.7 mL and the estimated average 95% confidence interval of individual measurements was ± 9%. The average intracranial and spinal contributions to the overall compliance were 65% and 35% respectively (n = 35).

conclusionsCombining lumbar CSF infusion and PC-MR imaging proved feasible and robust for assessment of the craniospinal PVI(CC). This study produced normative values and showed that the major compensatory contribution was located intracranially.

Indexed as

BrainCerebrospinal FluidCerebrospinal Fluid PressureFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMaleManometryMiddle AgedPulsatile FlowReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySpinal Cord

Identifiers

PMID20595369
PMCPMC7965007
OpenAlexW2159733732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.