Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20595308›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

Randomized clinical trial of a customized electronic alert requiring an affirmative response compared to a control group receiving a commercial passive CPOE alert: NSAID--warfarin co-prescribing as a test case.

Brian L Strom, Rita Schinnar, Warren Bilker, Sean Hennessy, Charles E Leonard, Eric Pifer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Electronic Medical Alerts Increase Screening for Chronic Hepatitis B: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2018
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Clinician collaboration to improve clinical decision support: the Clickbusters initiative.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brian L StromCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Pennsylvania 19104-6021, USA. bstrom@exchange.upenn.edu
Rita Schinnar
Warren Bilker
Sean Hennessy
Charles E Leonard
Eric Pifer
University of Pennsylvania · USEl Camino Hospital · US

Funding

Center For Education and Research in TherapeuticsU18HS016946 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI STROM, BRIAN LESLIE · 2007 to 2010
$4.0M
AHRQ HHS U18 HS016946AHRQ HHS U18HS016946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies that have looked at the effectiveness of computerized decision support systems to prevent drug-drug interactions have reported modest results because of low response by the providers to the automated alerts.

objectiveTo evaluate, within an inpatient computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system, the incremental effectiveness of an alert that required a response from the provider, intended as a stronger intervention to prevent concurrent orders of warfarin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

designRandomized clinical trial of 1963 clinicians assigned to either an intervention group receiving a customized electronic alert requiring affirmative response or a control group receiving a commercially available passive alert as part of the CPOE. The study duration was 2 August 2006 to 15 December 2007. MEASUREMENTS: Alert adherence was compared between study groups.

resultsThe proportion of desired ordering responses (ie, not reordering the alert-triggering drug after firing) was lower in the intervention group (114/464 (25%) customized alerts issued) than in the control group (154/560 (28%) passive alerts firing). The adjusted OR of inappropriate ordering was 1.22 (95% CI 0.69 to 2.16).

conclusionA customized CPOE alert that required a provider response had no effect in reducing concomitant prescribing of NSAIDs and warfarin beyond that of the commercially available passive alert received by the control group. New CPOE alerts cannot be assumed to be effective in improving prescribing, and need evaluation.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherenceMedical Order Entry SystemsUser-Computer InterfaceAnticoagulantsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDrug InteractionsHumansMedication ErrorsPennsylvaniaPractice Patterns, Nurses'Practice Patterns, Physicians'WarfarinAnticoagulantsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalWarfarin

Identifiers

PMID20595308
PMCPMC2995662
OpenAlexW2151712959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.