Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20595228›Full record

ArticleGenes & development2010

New chaps in the histone chaperone arena.

Eric I Campos, Danny Reinberg

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & development, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Epigenetic Regulation of Myogenesis: Focus on the Histone Variants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Targeting Chromatin Remodeling for Cancer Therapy.Current molecular pharmacology · 2019
    Review
  9. The Clinical Implications of Death Domain-Associated Protein (DAXX) Expression.The Korean journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eric I CamposDepartment of Biochemistry, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Danny Reinberg

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding exactly how chromatin is assembled is paramount to addressing how select histone modifications may be transmitted, a putative epigenetic process. In the June 15, 2010, issue of Genes & Development, Drané and colleagues (pp. 1253-1265) identified DAXX as a novel H3.3-specific chaperone. This finding, in the context of others published by Goldberg and colleagues in Cell and Sawatsubashi and colleagues (pp. 159-170) in the January 15, 2010, issue of Genes & Development, provides the impetus for uncovering the mechanistic and functional properties of alternative histone deposition pathways.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsCell CycleEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenetic VariationHistonesHumansInheritance PatternsMolecular ChaperonesMolecular Sequence DataSequence AlignmentHistonesMolecular Chaperones

Identifiers

PMID20595228
PMCPMC2895192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.