Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20595096›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2010

Macrophages as novel target cells for erythropoietin.

Lilach Lifshitz, Galit Tabak, Max Gassmann, Moshe Mittelman, Drorit Neumann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Erythropoietin and Skeletal Cells CrossTalks in Physiology and Disease.Current opinion in endocrine and metabolic research · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Prenatal Development and Function of Human Mononuclear Phagocytes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lilach LifshitzDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, histo6@post.tau.ac.il.
Galit Tabak
Max Gassmann
Moshe Mittelman
Drorit Neumann
Tel Aviv University · ILTel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center · ILUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur original demonstration of immunomodulatory effects of erythropoietin in multiple myeloma led us to the search for the cells in the immune system that are direct targets for erythropoietin. The finding that lymphocytes do not express erythropoietin receptors led to the hypothesis that other cells act as direct targets and thus mediate the effects of erythropoietin. The finding that erythropoietin has effects on dendritic cells thus led to the question of whether macrophages act as target cells for erythropoietin. DESIGN AND

methodsThe effects of erythropoietin on macrophages were investigated both in-vivo and in-vitro. The in-vivo studies were performed on splenic macrophages and inflammatory peritoneal macrophages, comparing recombinant human erythropoietin-treated and untreated mice, as well as transgenic mice over-expressing human erythropoietin (tg6) and their control wild-type counterparts. The in-vitro effects of erythropoietin on macrophage surface markers and function were investigated in murine bone marrow-derived macrophages treated with recombinant human erythropoietin.

resultsErythropoietin was found to have effects on macrophages in both the in-vivo and in-vitro experiments. In-vivo treatment led to increased numbers of splenic macrophages, and of the splenic macrophages expressing CD11b, CD80 and major histocompatibility complex class II. The peritoneal inflammatory macrophages obtained from erythropoietin-treated mice displayed increased expression of F4/80, CD11b, CD80 and major histocompatibility complex class II, and augmented phagocytic activity. The macrophages derived in-vitro from bone marrow cells expressed erythropoietin receptor transcripts, and in-vitro stimulation with erythropoietin activated multiple signaling pathways, including signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)1 and 5, mitogen-activated protein kinase, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and nuclear factor kappa B. In-vitro erythropoietin treatment of these cells up-regulated their surface expression of CD11b, F4/80 and CD80, enhanced their phagocytic activity and nitric oxide secretion, and also led to augmented interleukin 12 secretion and decreased interleukin 10 secretion in response to lipopolysaccharide.

conclusionsOur results show that macrophages are direct targets of erythropoietin and that erythropoietin treatment enhances the pro-inflammatory activity and function of these cells. These findings point to a multifunctional role of erythropoietin and its potential clinical applications as an immunomodulating agent.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, DifferentiationB7-1 AntigenBone Marrow CellsCD11b AntigenCells, CulturedErythropoietinFemaleHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIHumansImmunologic FactorsInterleukin-10Interleukin-12LipopolysaccharidesMacrophagesMiceAntigens, DifferentiationB7-1 AntigenCD11b AntigenErythropoietinHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIImmunologic FactorsInterleukin-10Interleukin-12LipopolysaccharidesMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinasesmonocyte-macrophage differentiation antigenNF-kappa BPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesRecombinant ProteinsStat1 protein, mouseSTAT1 Transcription FactorSTAT5 Transcription Factor

Identifiers

PMID20595096
PMCPMC2966903
OpenAlexW2148776731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.