Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20594297›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2010

Insufficient β-lactam concentrations in the early phase of severe sepsis and septic shock.

Fabio Silvio Taccone, Pierre-François Laterre, Thierry Dugernier, Herbert Spapen, Isabelle Delattre, Xavier Wittebole, Daniel De Backer, Brice Layeux, Pierre Wallemacq, Jean-Louis Vincent and 1 more

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 179 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
179citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
18.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02820987 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) of Extended-infusion Meropenem, Piperacillin-tazobactam and Cefepime in the Early Phase of Septic Shock

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de BesanconRan2016 to 2018Enrolled119ConditionsSeptic ShockArmsMEROPENEM, PIPERACILLIN-TAZOBACTAM, CEFEPIME
NCT03634904 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Observational Study of Serum Ceftazidime Concentrations in Hemodialysis Patients at the University Hospital of Charleroi, Belgium

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de CharleroiRan2018 to 2021Enrolled20ConditionsBacterial Infections, Ceftazidime, Renal Failure Chronic Requiring HemodialysisArmsDrug bood sampling
NCT05578586 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Pilot Study for Optimizing Meropenem Administration in the Intensive Care Unit - Short Six Times vs Prolonged Three Times Courses Daily

TypeinterventionalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2021 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsDrug EffectArmsMeropenem 1000 mg
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

179 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 369 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Clinical outcomes of extended versus intermittent administration of piperacillin/tazobactam for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia: a randomized controlled trial.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2017
    Trial
  10. Doripenem Treatment during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2015
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. ASP-COMPLEX: redefining antimicrobial stewardship to improve outcomes in high-risk patients with severe infections.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

119 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Fabio Silvio TacconeDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, route de Lennik 808, 1070 Bruxelles, Belgium. ftaccone@ulb.ac.be
Pierre-François Laterre
Thierry Dugernier
Herbert Spapen
Isabelle Delattre
Xavier Wittebole
Daniel De Backer
Brice Layeux
Pierre Wallemacq
Jean-Louis Vincent
Frédérique Jacobs
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BECliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BECentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Pierre · BEUniversitair Ziekenhuis Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAltered pharmacokinetics (PK) in critically ill patients can result in insufficient serum β-lactam concentrations when standard dosages are administered. Previous studies on β-lactam PK have generally excluded the most severely ill patients, or were conducted during the steady-state period of treatment. The aim of our study was to determine whether the first dose of piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, and meropenem would result in adequate serum drug concentrations in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.

methodsOpen, prospective, multicenter study in four Belgian intensive care units. All consecutive patients with a diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock, in whom treatment with the study drugs was indicated, were included. Serum concentrations of the antibiotics were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) before and 1, 1.5, 4.5 and 6 or 8 hours after administration.

results80 patients were treated with piperacillin-tazobactam (n = 27), ceftazidime (n = 18), cefepime (n = 19) or meropenem (n = 16). Serum concentrations remained above 4 times the minimal inhibitory concentration (T > 4 × MIC), corresponding to the clinical breakpoint for Pseudomonas aeruginosa defined by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), for 57% of the dosage interval for meropenem (target MIC = 8 μg/mL), 45% for ceftazidime (MIC = 32 μg/mL), 34% for cefepime (MIC = 32 μg/mL), and 33% for piperacillin-tazobactam (MIC = 64 μg/mL). The number of patients who attained the target PK profile was 12/16 for meropenem (75%), 5/18 for ceftazidime (28%), 3/19 (16%) for cefepime, and 12/27 (44%) for piperacillin-tazobactam.

conclusionsSerum concentrations of the antibiotic after the first dose were acceptable only for meropenem. Standard dosage regimens for piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime and cefepime may, therefore, be insufficient to empirically cover less susceptible pathogens in the early phase of severe sepsis and septic shock.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamsCefepimeCeftazidimeCephalosporinsChromatography, High Pressure LiquidDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMaleMeropenemMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedPenicillanic AcidPiperacillinProspective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamsCefepimeCeftazidimeCephalosporinsMeropenemPenicillanic AcidPiperacillinTazobactamThienamycins

Identifiers

PMID20594297
PMCPMC2945087
OpenAlexW1996134595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.