ReviewPaediatric drugs2010
Mometasone furoate in children with mild to moderate persistent asthma: a review of the evidence.
Review in Paediatric drugs, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- The efficacy of mometasone furoate for children with asthma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2021Review
- New Drugs for Pediatric Asthma.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2018Review
- Mometasone furoate nasal spray: a systematic review.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2016Review
- Pediatric asthma: guidelines-based care, omalizumab, and other potential biologic agents.Immunology and allergy clinics of North America · 2015Review
- Newer treatments in the management of pediatric asthma.Paediatric drugs · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The high prevalence of asthma in pediatric patients underscores the need for effective and safe treatment in this population. Current treatment guidelines recommend inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) as a preferred treatment for the control of mild to moderate persistent asthma in patients of all ages, including young children. Clinical efficacy, systemic safety, and ease of use are desirable attributes of an ICS used to treat children with persistent asthma. Recently, mometasone furoate administered via a dry powder inhaler (MF-DPI) 110 microg once daily in the evening (delivered dose of 100 microg) was approved by the US FDA for the maintenance treatment of asthma in children 4-11 years of age. Data from the clinical trial program for MF-DPI that establish the efficacy, long-term safety, and absence of systemic effects of the approved dosage in children with mild to moderate persistent asthma are reviewed. These findings indicate that once-daily dosing of MF-DPI in children aged 4-11 years significantly improves lung function and health-related quality of life while reducing rescue medication use and exacerbations despite previous treatment with other ICSs. MF-DPI is also well tolerated in children. Clinical trial results showed that, at the approved dosage, there are no effects on growth velocity or the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Results of pediatric studies are consistent with the clinical development program for adults and adolescents. In addition, once-daily dosing, established safety, and ease of use of MF-DPI may help to improve asthma management by addressing issues that inhibit proper adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.