Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20592748›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2010

Biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: academic, industry and regulatory perspectives.

Harald Hampel, Richard Frank, Karl Broich, Stefan J Teipel, Russell G Katz, John Hardy, Karl Herholz, Arun L W Bokde, Frank Jessen, Yvonne C Hoessler and 4 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 239 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
239citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

239 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. ADCOMS: a composite clinical outcome for prodromal Alzheimer's disease trials.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2016
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review

179 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Harald HampelDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Heinrich-Hoffmann-Str. 10, 60528 Frankfurt/Main, Germany. harald.hampel@med.uni-frankfurt.de
Richard Frank
Karl Broich
Stefan J Teipel
Russell G Katz
John Hardy
Karl Herholz
Arun L W Bokde
Frank Jessen
Yvonne C Hoessler
Wendy R Sanhai
Henrik Zetterberg
Janet Woodcock
Kaj Blennow

Funding

Medical Research Council G0701075Medical Research Council MR/K01417X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in therapeutic strategies for Alzheimer's disease that lead to even small delays in onset and progression of the condition would significantly reduce the global burden of the disease. To effectively test compounds for Alzheimer's disease and bring therapy to individuals as early as possible there is an urgent need for collaboration between academic institutions, industry and regulatory organizations for the establishment of standards and networks for the identification and qualification of biological marker candidates. Biomarkers are needed to monitor drug safety, to identify individuals who are most likely to respond to specific treatments, to stratify presymptomatic patients and to quantify the benefits of treatments. Biomarkers that achieve these characteristics should enable objective business decisions in portfolio management and facilitate regulatory approval of new therapies.

Indexed as

BiomarkersAlzheimer DiseaseAnimalsClinical Trials as TopicDrug DiscoveryDrug IndustryEndpoint DeterminationHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMolecular BiologyPositron-Emission TomographyRisk AssessmentBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID20592748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.