Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20592044›Full record

ReviewSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2010

Theory and methods in cultural neuroscience.

Joan Y Chiao, Ahmad R Hariri, Tokiko Harada, Yoko Mano, Norihiro Sadato, Todd B Parrish, Tetsuya Iidaka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cross-Cultural Validation of the Barcelona Immigration Stress Scale.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Developmental aspects in cultural neuroscience.Developmental review : DR · 2018
    Article
  9. [Formula: see text]Selecting measures for the neurodevelopmental assessment of children in low- and middle-income countries.Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence · 2017
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Current emotion research in cultural neuroscience.Emotion review : journal of the International Society for Research on Emotion · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. What is a representative brain? Neuroscience meets population science.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joan Y ChiaoDepartment of Psychology and Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA. jchiao@northwestern.edu
Ahmad R Hariri
Tokiko Harada
Yoko Mano
Norihiro Sadato
Todd B Parrish
Tetsuya Iidaka

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cultural neuroscience is an emerging research discipline that investigates cultural variation in psychological, neural and genomic processes as a means of articulating the bidirectional relationship of these processes and their emergent properties. Research in cultural neuroscience integrates theory and methods from anthropology, cultural psychology, neuroscience and neurogenetics. Here, we review a set of core theoretical and methodological challenges facing researchers when planning and conducting cultural neuroscience studies, and provide suggestions for overcoming these challenges. In particular, we focus on the problems of defining culture and culturally appropriate experimental tasks, comparing neuroimaging data acquired from different populations and scanner sites and identifying functional genetic polymorphisms relevant to culture. Implications of cultural neuroscience research for addressing current issues in population health disparities are discussed.

Indexed as

CultureBrainBrain MappingCross-Cultural ComparisonHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeurosciencesPolymorphism, GeneticResearch DesignStereotyping

Identifiers

PMID20592044
PMCPMC2894689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.