ReviewSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2010
Cultural neuroscience of the self: understanding the social grounding of the brain.
Review in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 330 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heart rate variability and emotion regulation: Multiethnic differences in reappraisal and suppression.Emotion (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Experience-Tuned Predictive Coding in Monocultural Brains: A Visual Mismatch Response Study.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
- Childhood cumulative risk and relationship addiction: a developmental timing-pathway differentiation-node buffering integrative model.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The need for cultural sensitivity and epistemic justice in applying neuroscience advances in the Global South.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Attribution of consciousness to non-human animals: insights from AI and multidimensional frameworks.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Evolutionary Trajectories of Consciousness: From Biological Foundations to Technological Horizons.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Reliability and validity of the Mentalization Questionnaire in a potentially depressed group of Chinese college students.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- East Asian perspective of responsible research and innovation in neurotechnology.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2024Article
- Impact of cognitive biases on environmental compliance risk perceptions in international construction projects.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- When fixing problems kills personal development: fMRI reveals conflict between Real and Ideal selves.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- The neuroscience of respect: insights from cross-cultural perspectives.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Review
- Cortico-limbic disruption, material-specificity, and deficits in cognitive-affective theory of mind.Brain communications · 2023Article
- You Eat How You Think: A Review on the Impact of Cognitive Styles on Food Perception and Behavior.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Processing of an Audiobook in the Human Brain Is Shaped by Cultural Family Background.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Harmony and Aversion in the Face of a Pandemic.The Japanese psychological research · 2022Article
- Functional connectome fingerprint of holistic-analytic cultural style.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2022Article
- Visualizing Research Trends on Culture Neuroscience (2008-2021): A Bibliometric Analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Review
- Collectivism is associated with enhanced neural response to socially salient errors among adolescents.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2021Article
- Article
- Individual differences in envy experienced through perspective-taking involves functional connectivity of the superior frontal gyrus.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cultural neuroscience is an interdisciplinary field of research that investigates interrelations among culture, mind and the brain. Drawing on both the growing body of scientific evidence on cultural variation in psychological processes and the recent development of social and cognitive neuroscience, this emerging field of research aspires to understand how culture as an amalgam of values, meanings, conventions, and artifacts that constitute daily social realities might interact with the mind and its underlying brain pathways of each individual member of the culture. In this article, following a brief review of studies that demonstrate the surprising degree to which brain processes are malleably shaped by cultural tools and practices, the authors discuss cultural variation in brain processes involved in self-representations, cognition, emotion and motivation. They then propose (i) that primary values of culture such as independence and interdependence are reflected in the compositions of cultural tasks (i.e. daily routines designed to accomplish the cultural values) and further (ii) that active and sustained engagement in these tasks yields culturally patterned neural activities of the brain, thereby laying the ground for the embodied construction of the self and identity. Implications for research on culture and the brain are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.