Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20591841›Full record

Trial reportEuropean heart journal2010

Contributions of remote monitoring to the follow-up of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads under advisory.

Laurence Guédon-Moreau, Philippe Chevalier, Christelle Marquié, Claude Kouakam, Didier Klug, Dominique Lacroix, Francois Brigadeau, Salem Kacet, ECOST trial Investigators

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European heart journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Cost-consequence analysis of daily continuous remote monitoring of implantable cardiac defibrillator and resynchronization devices in the UK.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2013
    Pooled it
  2. A prospective comparison of remote monitoring systems in implantable cardiac defibrillators: potential effects of frequency of transmissions.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2016
    Trial
  3. Home monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: interpretation reliability of the second-generation "IEGM Online" system.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2015
    Trial
  4. Costs of remote monitoring vs. ambulatory follow-ups of implanted cardioverter defibrillators in the randomized ECOST study.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2014
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Integration of data from remote monitoring systems and programmers into the hospital electronic health record system based on international standards.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2012
    Article
  14. Use of remote monitoring in the management of system-related complications in implantable defibrillator patients.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2012
    Article
  15. ISHNE/EHRA expert consensus on remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs).Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2012
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laurence Guédon-MoreauHôpital Cardiologique, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, 59 boulevard Leclerq, F-59037 Lille cedex, France. laurence.guedon@chru-lille.fr
Philippe Chevalier
Christelle Marquié
Claude Kouakam
Didier Klug
Dominique Lacroix
Francois Brigadeau
Salem Kacet
ECOST trial Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsAutomatic daily transmission of data from implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) enables the remote monitoring of device status and leads function. We report on a 2-year experience with remote monitoring in 40 recipients of high-voltage ICD leads, prone to fracture and under advisory since October 2007. METHODS AND

resultsThe ICDs were remotely monitored as well as systematically interrogated in the ambulatory department every 3 months. The patients were also seen in case of abnormal lead impedance, or other manifestations consistent with lead dysfunction. Over a mean follow-up of 22 ± 4 months after ICD implantation, four lead dysfunctions were suspected because of remotely transmitted oversensing of noise artifacts, abrupt rise in pacing impedance, or both. A lead fracture needing lead replacement was confirmed in three patients (7.5%), two of them before any inappropriate therapy and one after the delivery of three inappropriate shocks. No lead failure was observed in the remaining 36 patients, either at the time of ambulatory visits or during remote monitoring.

conclusionRemote monitoring allowed the early and reliable detection of ICD leads failure without requiring any patient intervention.

Indexed as

AgedDefibrillators, ImplantableElectric InjuriesElectrocardiographyElectrodesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart DiseasesHome Care ServicesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, AmbulatoryProsthesis FailureTelemedicineTelemetry

Identifiers

PMID20591841
PMCPMC2938466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.