Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20591532›Full record

ReviewTrends in ecology & evolution2010

Promiscuous DNA: horizontal transfer of transposable elements and why it matters for eukaryotic evolution.

Sarah Schaack, Clément Gilbert, Cédric Feschotte

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in ecology & evolution, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 255 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
255citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

255 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The selfish ribosome.PLoS biology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The ongoing invasion of the endogenous retrovirusbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

195 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah SchaackDepartment of Biology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA.
Clément Gilbert
Cédric Feschotte

Funding

Human DNA transposons: evolutionary history and genomic impactR01GM077582 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI FESCHOTTE, CEDRIC · 2007 to 2015
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077582NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM77582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Horizontal transfer is the passage of genetic material between genomes by means other than parent-to-offspring inheritance. Although the transfer of genes is thought to be crucial in prokaryotic evolution, few instances of horizontal gene transfer have been reported in multicellular eukaryotes; instead, most cases involve transposable elements. With over 200 cases now documented, it is possible to assess the importance of horizontal transfer for the evolution of transposable elements and their host genomes. We review criteria for detecting horizontal transfers and examine recent examples of the phenomenon, shedding light on its mechanistic underpinnings, including the role of host-parasite interactions. We argue that the introduction of transposable elements by horizontal transfer in eukaryotic genomes has been a major force propelling genomic variation and biological innovation.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBacteriaDNADNA Transposable ElementsPlantsDNADNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID20591532
PMCPMC2940939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.