Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20590909›Full record

SynthesisHPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association2010

Hepatic resection for post-cholecystectomy bile duct injuries: a literature review.

Stéphanie Truant, Emmanuel Boleslawski, Gilles Lebuffe, Géraldine Sergent, François-René Pruvot

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Hepaticojejunostomy for bile duct injury: state of the art.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Postcholecystectomy bile duct injury and its sequelae: pathogenesis, classification, and management.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2014
    Review
  15. Hepatectomy for bile duct injuries: when is it necessary?World journal of gastroenterology · 2013
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Timing and risk factors of hepatectomy in the management of complications following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Stéphanie TruantDepartment of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospitals, Lille, France. s-truant@chru-lille.fr
Emmanuel Boleslawski
Gilles Lebuffe
Géraldine Sergent
François-René Pruvot
Brain Physiology Lab · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRHôpital Claude Huriez · FRInserm · FRInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study seeks to identify factors for hepatectomy in the management of post-cholecystectomy bile duct injury (BDI) and outcome via a systematic review of the literature.

methodsRelevant literature was found by searching the PubMed database and the bibliographies of extracted articles. To avoid bias selection, factors for hepatectomy were analysed in series reporting both patients undergoing hepatectomy and patients undergoing biliary repair without hepatectomy (bimodal treatment). Relevant variables were the presence or absence of additional hepatic artery and/or portal vein injury, the level of BDI, and a previous biliary repair.

resultsAmong 460 potentially relevant publications, only 31 met the eligibility criteria. A total of 99 hepatectomies were reported among 1756 (5.6%) patients referred for post-cholecystectomy BDI. In eight series reporting bimodal treatment, including 232 patients, logistic regression multivariate analysis showed that hepatic arterial and Strasberg E4 and E5 injuries were independent factors associated with hepatectomy. Patients with combined arterial and Strasberg E4 or E5 injury were 43.3 times more likely to undergo hepatectomy (95% confidence interval 8.0-234.2) than patients without complex injury. Despite high postoperative morbidity, mortality rates were comparable with those of hepaticojejunostomy, except in urgent hepatectomies (within 2 weeks; four of nine patients died). Longterm outcome was satisfactory in 12 of 18 patients in the largest series.

conclusionsHepatectomies were performed mainly in patients showing complex concurrent Strasberg E4 or E5 and hepatic arterial injury and provided satisfactory longterm outcomes despite high postoperative morbidity.

Indexed as

HepatectomyBile DuctsChi-Square DistributionCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicHepatic ArteryHumansIatrogenic DiseaseLogistic ModelsPatient SelectionPortal VeinRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID20590909
PMCPMC2951822
OpenAlexW1962392732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.